Site
Index:
Site Index / Menu.

Is Rush Limbaugh a Racist?
Web Posted Thursday, Oct. 2, 2003

Use Your Browser's BACK Button to Return

You Decide!

          Here's the complete statement that got Rush Limbaugh fired by ESPN this week.  (They said he "resigned" but you know how that works.)

          During Sunday's ESPN broadcast of their NFL Countdown program (9/28/03), Limbaugh was talking about Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb, who is black:

Limbaugh:   "I don't think he's been that good from the get-go.  I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL.  I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well.  They're interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well.  I think there's a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn't deserve.   The defense carried this team." [Note 1]

          Here's what the black racial special interests had to say about Limbaugh's comment:

          According to the Washington Post:   "Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.), chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, called the talk show host's remarks 'outrageous and offensive.'  "They have no place in American society and I would hope that he would not hide behind the First Amendment to defend such insensitive comments," Cummings said in a statement. "People like Rush Limbaugh are a constant reminder that we still have a long way to go in dealing with race in America. I call on the executives and leadership of ESPN and its parent company, Disney, to swiftly address this matter." [Note 1]

          Also according to the Washington Post:  "The NAACP also condemned Limbaugh's remarks, calling them "bigoted and ignorant," and called for the network to fire Limbaugh or at least provide an opposing point of view on the show. "It is appalling that ESPN has to go to this extent to try to increase viewership," NAACP President Kweisi Mfume said in a statement." [Note 1]

          According to Talon News, "Democrats seeking the presidency were quick to call for Limbaugh's resignation." [Note 2]

          Talon News reports that former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean said "There is no legitimate place in sports broadcasting for voices that seek to discredit the achievement of athletes on the basis of race". [Note 2]

          Talon also reports the following statement by retired General Wesley Clark: "There can be no excuse for such statements. Mr. Limbaugh has the right to say whatever he wants, but ABC and ESPN have no obligation to sponsor such hateful and ignorant speech. Mr. Limbaugh should be fired immediately". [Note 2]


Adversity.Net Commentary

          Rush Limbaugh expressed an opinion about the sport of football which is what ESPN hired him to do.  ESPN hoped that Limbaugh would inject a little controversy into their sports programming, thereby boosting their sagging ratings.  Limbaugh did exactly that.  In no way was Rush "bigoted" as accused by the NAACP today.

          Rush Limbaugh did not say anything remotely racist or even (perish the thought!) insensitive!  Please re-read the exact text of Limbaugh's supposedly controversial statement:

Limbaugh:   "I don't think he's [Donovan McNabb] been that good from the get-go.  I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL.  I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well.  They're interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well.  I think there's a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn't deserve.   The defense carried this team."

          In that statement, Rush Limbaugh correctly and accurately stated that the media have a great deal of interest in black quarterbacks and black coaches doing well.  Nothing could be more obviously true in this age of politically-correct racial politics.

          Of course, Rush may have been just a tad inaccurate about Donovan McNabb's quarterbacking skills, or about McNabb's contributions to the Philadelphia Eagles, but ESPN did not hire Limbaugh because of the depth of his sports knowledge.  Limbaugh is a huge football fan, but he is not a professional sports commentator.

          ESPN hired Limbaugh to express his opinions, which is exactly what he did.  And he got fired for it.

          Remember also that this past summer the NFL levied a fine against the Detroit Lions to the tune of $200,000 for hiring a white coach.  The fine was levied because the NFL had previously bowed to the racial special interests and had agreed to interview at least one "person of color" for coaching jobs before making their final selection.  Unfortunately, the Detroit Lions had trouble getting any black coaching candidates to agree to an interview because the black coaching candidates all knew that they were to be "window dressing", i.e., not seriously considered for the job, simply in order to satisfy this absurd and facially racist NFL requirement.

          On his popular EIBN radio talk show Rush Limbaugh had been extremely critical of that particular racialist farce, so he was already on the "hit list" of the racial special interests.  (Interestingly, in his earlier criticism of the Detroit Lions farce, Limbaugh pointed out that such moronic racially sensitive policies were bad for black athletes and coaches and he expressed sympathy for the blacks who were forced by such policies to be used as "window dressing".  The racial special interests didn't make a peep about that comment.)

          In that context, today's hysterical reaction of the racial special interests to Rush Limbaugh's innocuous statement on ESPN last Sunday was totally predictable. 

          In this age of political correctness and racial orthodoxy it is not permissible to criticize the race-sensitive double standards which give special preferences or benefits or media treatment to blacks, Hispanics, or Native Americans.  Rep. Elijah Cummings and NAACP's Kweise Mfume made that perfectly clear on behalf of their special particular racial interest, which happens to be black folks (and which interest specifically excludes white folks).

          The politically-correct racial orthodoxy further states that it is only permissible to criticize whites, European Americans, or sometimes even Asian Americans if they happen to benefit from their skin color.

          The truth is that whites, European Americans, most Asian Americans -- and even most blacks -- only want equal treatment regardless of race, gender or ethnicity.  Just like our Constitution guarantees!

-- Tim Fay, Chairman and Editor, Adversity.Net, Inc.


Note 1:  Excerpted from the Leonard Shapiro story which appeared on page A1 of the Washington Post Thursday, Oct. 2, 2003.  Last known link to the story:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A34359-2003Oct2.html

Note 2:  Excerpted from the online Talon News story written by reporter Charles Mahaleris Oct. 2, 2003.  No link is available.

Main Site Index:

Top:
Go to Top of Page
MAIN NEWS
Index

by category
DONATE
Contributions are tax-deductible
HORROR
STORIES

and case studies
TERMS
and Definitions
SEARCH
Site
LEGAL HELP
Firms and Resources
LINKS MESSAGE
Board
GO:  Home Page
Home
Page Index
URL's and page names for site
Favorite
EDITORIALS

National opinion
DIRTY RACIAL
POLITICS

How Quotas are Enforced
EDITOR'S DESK
What's Hot!
RACIAL
PROFILING

D.O.J. Requires It!
EDUCATIONAL
TESTING

News Analysis
CENSUS 2000
Racism
ABOUT US

Copyright 2002 Adversity.Net, Inc., an IRS 501(c)(3) tax-exempt educational organization.  For problems or questions regarding this web contact editor@adversity.net    Last updated: October 03, 2003.

Go to Adversity.Net Home Page

*  We use the term reverse discrimination reluctantly and only because it is so widely understood.  In our opinion there really is only one kind of discrimination.