|
June 1999 marked the 25th anniversary of federal judge W. Arthur Garrity's 1974 order to
integrate Boston's schools through forced busing. He became known as the most hated
man in Boston.
25 years later what has been the result? This special Adversity.Net section was
inspired by the Boston Globe's series of excellent retrospectives on this historic, and
some would say tragic, event.
See Also: Judge
Garrity is dead, but are his divisive busing rulings dead?
25 Years of Forced
Busing
End
busing, seek quality education (08/12/99
- dead link)
"Charlotte became ground zero for a noble but failed social experiment forced upon
the country by the Supreme Court.
"In 1971, Charlotte became ground zero for a noble but failed social experiment
forced upon the country by the U.S. Supreme Court. In its historic Swann vs.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg school decision, the court permitted racially segregated school
districts to begin busing in order to achieve integration.
"What began as an effort to remedy the grave wrongs of state-sanctioned racial
segregation has turned American society -- black and white -- on its head. The
neighborhood school concept, with the pride and solidarity it engenders in a community,
has been badly damaged for the last three decades.
"Most observers of the recently concluded trial over busing and admissions to magnet
schools believe Charlotte-Mecklenburg stands on the verge of a ruling that will declare
its school system ``unitary'' and free it from court ordered desegregation plans.
"While some are predicting dire consequences if Federal District Judge Robert Potter
abolishes busing, the evidence throughout the country suggests that busing has not
accomplished its goals and, in fact, has had many negative consequences.
"Years after a Kansas City court implemented busing, black students in integrated
magnet schools performed no better than blacks in neighborhood schools. San Francisco
spent more than $200 million [on busing] following a 1982 court order to end school
segregation, but a 1992 study led by Harvard Professor Gary Orfield, who supports busing,
found black and Hispanic students lacked ``even modest overall improvement'' [as a result
of intrusive court-ordered busing.] A National Institute of Education report could
not even find a single study showing black kids fared appreciably better following a
switch to integrated schools.
"...In fact, it is patronizing to think that minority students need to sit next to a
white student in order to learn. Many black leaders, from Wisconsin State Rep. Annette
Polly Williams, a Milwaukee Democrat, to Cleveland Mayor Michael White have come to that
conclusion and led efforts to end busing.
"...Busing teaches our children a terrible lesson. Rather than eliminating racial
discrimination, busing promotes it by teaching children that the government should treat
them differently on the basis of their race." (Charlotte Observer 08/12/99 by
Marc Levin and Ed Blum)
[former link
**http://www.charlotte.com/observer/opinion/view/pub/049962.htm]
Boston Board Votes To End Era Of
Race-Based Assignment (08/04/99)
"In a move widely seen as the end of an era, Boston school officials have decided
that this coming school year will be the last in which they use race as a factor in
determining where students go to school.
"Facing pressure from a lawsuit by white parents and advocates of neighborhood
schools, the city's school board voted 5-2 last month to adopt a race-blind admissions
policy starting in September 2000.
"The city has been using a "controlled choice" system of assigning students
for the past decade, since shortly after a federal judge ended his supervision of a
desegregation plan that had led to violent clashes over busing in the mid-1970s. "It
was pretty clear that using race in student assignment was not going to withstand court
scrutiny," Elizabeth Reilinger, the chairwoman of the school board, said last week.
"We didn't think we had a viable case."
"Board members and Superintendent Thomas W. Payzant concluded that it was better to
switch than fight in part because of the generally dim view federal judges have taken of
race-based policies in recent years. And last fall, the district's long-running legal
battle to defend race-conscious admissions at the prestigious Boston Latin School ended in
failure when a federal appeals court struck down the policy." (Education Week,
08/04/99 edition, by Caroline Hendrie)
[link http://www.edweek.org/ew/vol-18/43boston.h18
]
(Also See Related: Boston Latin School, Adversity.Net special)
Closing a chapter on
school desegregation (07/16/99)
"Boston's decision to end efforts to racially balance its schools - 25 years after a
federal court ruled they were illegally segregated - is the latest sign that educational
equity is being redefined in the United States.
"From colleges in Texas and California to school districts in North Carolina and
Kentucky, racial criteria in school admissions are being disallowed by or challenged in
the courts - including in a case earlier this year involving a public exam-school in
Boston. The court cases, coupled with a growing public sentiment that remedies such as
busing and affirmative action are no longer needed in America, are leading some cities to
deemphasize race in favor of other options, such as charter schools, voucher plans, and a
return to emphasizing neighborhood schools." (Christain Science Monitor
07/16/99 by Stacy Teicher)
[link http://www.csmonitor.com/durable/1999/07/16/fp1s3-csm.shtml
]
Busing's Day Ends: Boston Drops
Race in Pupil Placement (07/15/99 -
dead link)
BOSTON -- "In the most powerful symbol yet that the era of race-based busing is
ending in America, the Boston School Committee voted on Wednesday night to drop race as a
factor in deciding which school a child attends. The vote will effectively end in 2000 the
last vestiges of the city's busing integration program, 25 years after its violent
inception tarred Boston with a reputation for northern racism and school busing strife.
"The committee's vote of 5 to 2 completed a neat historical circle: In 1974, it was a
Federal judge who found that Boston's de facto school segregation discriminated against
black children and ordered the busing. Wednesday night, the committee voted under pressure
from a pending Federal lawsuit that argues that the current system discriminates against
white children.
"City authorities who encouraged the vote to return to neighborhood schools said they
acted out of awareness that here and nationwide, affirmative action programs and other
school admissions systems that take race into account have lost again and again in recent
court challenges." (New York Times 07/15/99 by Carey Goldberg)
[former link
**http://www.nytimes.com/library/national/071599boston-busing-edu.html]
(See Related: Boston
Latin School, Adversity.Net special)
Busing Still Divisive 25 Years
Later; Parents Sue for Race-Neutral Policies (06/22/99 - dead link)
"Twenty-five years to the day [that] a federal judge ordered Boston to desegregate
its public schools - leading to one of the most tumultuous and ugly chapters in the city's
history - a group of parents yesterday asked a federal court to abandon the last remnants
of the plan.
"Saying four white students were unconstitutionally denied entrance to schools
because of their race, the lawsuit asks the US District Court to throw out a decade-old
policy that assigns students to schools based on choice and race. The plaintiffs want a
race-neutral admissions policy in place by September.
"Around the country, similar suits are asking federal courts to throw out any public
student assignment policy that uses race. The courts have largely been sympathetic to such
cases - and in some cases have ordered entire desegregation orders lifted in school
districts. 'It is unfair for my son to be denied anything because of his race,' said
Rose O'Toole, one of the five plaintiffs and a mother of a 4-year-old who she says was
denied entrance to his choice of kindergarten because he was white. Boston's Children
First, a pro-neighborhood school group, spearheaded the lawsuit and also is a plaintiff.
"[This] lawsuit is filed after a three-year losing effort by Boston public schools to
defend race-based admission policies at the system's top exam school [the infamous Boston
Latin School]. School officials argued that the educational value to a diverse student
body is so great, a race-based policy is needed to ensure it.
"A federal appeals court, however, ruled in December that the city could not use race
in assigning students to Boston Latin School. Soon after, the School Committee abandoned a
pledge to take the case to the US Supreme Court, fearing it would lose the
precedent-setting case and jeopardize desegregation efforts around the
country." (Boston Globe, 06/22/99 by Beth Daley)
[former link
**http://www.globe.com/dailyglobe2/173/metro/Suit_targets_city_on_school_admissions+.shtml]
| Related / Simlar Story: Boston parents sue over race-based school assignment
(again, and again!) (06/22/99 - deadlink)
BOSTON (AP) "A group of parents asked the federal court to throw out what's
left of the city's public school desegregation plan, despite warnings that such a move
could reverse the city's [racial quotas in schools] over the past 25 years.
"The lawsuit, filed Monday, claims four white students were unconstitutionally denied
entrance to their schools of choice because of their race. It asks the court to
throw out a School Department policy that considers race when assigning students to
schools.
"The lawsuit was filed 25 years to the day after U.S. District Judge W. Arthur
Garrity Jr. ruled that segregation in Boston schools violated the equal protection of the
city's black children under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. "If this
prevails, we're going to guarantee a segregated system,'' City Councilor Charles Yancey,
who represents the predominantly minority neighborhoods of Mattapan and Dorchester, said
Monday.
In a particularly regressive, undemocratic statement, Yancey added: "It seems
patently obvious the thrust of the suit is to have schools based on the demographic makeup
of the neighborhoods''. Hmmm. Now THERES a concept! Schools composed of
the people who live in the neighborhood in which the school is located! Egads!
Attempting to justify continued busing of children away from their own neighborhood
schooks, Yancy was also quoted as saying: "Children should not be restricted
geographically to where they go to school.'' You know what, Mr. Yancey? It is
really, really doubtful that the kids and their parents consider it
"restrictive" to be able to attend a school in their own neighborhood.
"The plaintiffs say parents and students will feel more involved if the youngsters
are allowed to attend schools closer to home, instead of being bused across the city to
achieve racial balance." (Associated Press 06/22/99 via FoxNews)
[former link
**http://www.foxnews.com/js_index.sml?content=/news/wires2/0622/n_ap_0622_124.sml] |
Garrity's folly - 25
years after busing began, by Jeff Jacoby, 01-04-99
(dead link)
" 'We came up with certain solutions, and - damn, it was working quite well, really.'
- Federal Judge Arthur Garrity Jr., author of Boston's racial busing plan, in a recent
interview.
"He would win, hands down, any contest for the Most Hated Bostonian of the last 30
years. And deservedly so. For Judge Garrity did more than inflict on Boston's schools and
families a nightmare of riots, fear, racial hatred, and civic trauma. He did it with such
blithe indifference to the pain of those he was hurting, such cool disdain for anyone who
doubted the wisdom of accomplishing integration through massive crosstown busing, that to
this day he still insists, ''Damn, it was working quite well, really.'
"This June will mark the 25th anniversary of Garrity's order to forcibly achieve
racial balance in Boston's public schools, an order that convulsed the city and triggered
the most violent and notorious antibusing backlash in the nation. Images from the riots of
1974 still sear. Stanley Forman won the Pulitzer Prize with his unforgettable photograph
of a black man being rammed with an American flag outside Boston City Hall.
" 'The plan that Garrity imposed upon the city was punitive in the extreme,' write
Stephan and Abigail Thernstrom in ''America in Black and White,'' their essential 1997
book on race relations. 'Indeed, the judge's advisers and the state Board of Education
believed that those against whom it was directed - in their eyes, localist, uneducated,
and bigoted - deserved to be punished. The plan thus paired Roxbury High, in the heart of
the ghetto, with South Boston High, in the toughest, most insular, working-class section
of the city. Blacks bused in from Roxbury would make up half of the sophomore class at
South Boston High, while the whole junior class from `Southie' would be shipped off to
Roxbury High.' " (Boston Globe 01-04-99, page A15)
[former link *http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2
/004/oped/Garrity_s_folly___25_years_after_busing_began+.shtml]
Boston Mayor's Plan to End
Busing Causes Minority Concern by
Elizabeth Mehren 02/18/99 (dead link)
"Almost in passing, Mayor Thomas M. Menino recently announced in his state of the
city address that he plans to return Boston to a system of neighborhood schools [a former
key word among busing advocates]. 'The key thing is to give parents the choice
where to send their child to school, [Mayor Menino] declared. 'Parents should make that
decision. Not the politicians.'
"Many wondered: If the schools are inadequate, how worthwhile is it to spend $30
million a year to bus students from one part of town to another? On the other hand, why
walk your child to a low-quality neighborhood school? In a district where only 20% of
students are white, what does desegregation mean, anyway? Has busing become a symbolic
anachronism? And if neighborhood schools are instituted, does that mean the end of busing?
"Around the country, neighborhood schools are the vogue among educators and civic
leaders who hope nearby classrooms will encourage parental involvement and turn school
buildings into mini-community centers. But neighborhood schooling also was the fashion in
the bad old days before busing, said Washington 'civil rights' lawyer William L.
Taylor." (LA Times, 02/18/99, by Elizabeth Mehren)
[former link
*http://www.latimes.com/excite/990218/t000015174.html]
School busing: an era in decline by Laurent Belsie 02/02/99
"After 30 years of court orders, some cities seek to trade goal of integration for
one of better schools. Three decades after federal courts began ordering cities to
mix their classrooms racially [primarily thru forced busing], the pendulum has begun to
swing the other direction. A growing number of cities are dismantling their busing
programs. Today, St. Louis votes on a sales-tax increase that, if approved, would bring it
closer to ending 27 years of court jurisdiction over its schools.
"But what next? Answers are murky.
"Although backers and critics of desegregation disagree on almost everything, they
share common ground on this: The racial mixing of schoolchildren has so far failed to
alleviate America's long-standing challenges with race relations, urban poverty, and
minority underachievement. Integration has been overwhelmed by stronger forces, such as
family circumstances and the changing racial composition of inner cities. (Christain
Science Monitor, 02/02/99, by Laurent Belsie)
[link http://www.csmonitor.com/durable/1999/02/02/p1s1.htm
]
Busing's legacy: racial
isolation by Jeff Jacoby 01-07-99 (dead link)
"On the Tuesday before Christmas, Billy Niedzwiecki was jumped by three schoolmates
in a bathroom at South Boston High School. They stomped on him, broke his glasses, ripped
a gold chain from his neck, and stabbed him five times. So severe was the attack that
Billy had to undergo surgery twice at Boston Medical Center.
"Police were quick to deny that race played a role in the stabbing - even though
Billy, a South Boston native, is white and his attackers, who come from other
neighborhoods, are black. Maybe the police are right, but no one would be surprised to
learn otherwise. South Boston High has simmered with violence and racial uneasiness ever
since 1974, when Judge W. Arthur Garrity ordered the School Department to forcibly
intermingle black kids from Roxbury and white kids from South Boston. Busing put public
schools like Southie High under a sort of martial law, with hundreds of state troopers
patrolling the corridors, snipers posted on the roof, and metal detectors at the doors.
"In the quarter-century since busing began, South Boston High School has erupted
several times in racial brawls. In 1993, hundreds of students, black and white, hurled
rocks, punches, and racist slurs at one another. Five people ended up in the hospital,
including two police officers and the mayor. To this day, police still patrol the grounds
of South Boston High. There are still metal detectors at the entrance. Judge Garrity's
legacy endures." (Boston Globe, 01-07-99, page A13)
[former link
*http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/007/editorials/Busing_s_legacy__racial_isolation+.shtml]
Records from busing give glimpse
into history, by Alison Fitzgerald 12-07-98 (dead link)
"W. Arthur Garrity was once the most hated man in Boston. The federal judge who in
1974 ordered Boston to integrate the city's schools through busing ignited a war between
the races and the neighborhoods that changed the face and reputation of the city forever.
" 'If you pass your laws, we will before long have a black Boston not an integrated
one,' wrote one Boston resident. The letter was just one of thousands written to Garrity
that now fill eight file boxes.
"Today, Garrity is scheduled to donate those files and 52 other boxes jammed with
documents related to the marathon desegregation case, to the University of Massachusetts
at Boston. The papers offer a glimpse into the complexity of the legal issues and
the raw emotion of the students and parents affected by the ruling.
" 'You just sold the people down the river for your own convenience ... You think
your decision won't reach the suburbs or your own children, you're wrong.' said one
letter, written four days after Garrity ordered the schools integrated on June 21,
1974. Its postscript read, 'I hope you die a very miserable death, preferably by
cancer.'
" 'White flight' became a stark reality in Boston, where the percentage of white
students dropped from 49 percent to 19 percent in 20 years as families fled to the
suburbs. The 1980 census showed that 12 percent of the city's population - about 80,000
people - had left since 1970. One third of the families with children under 18 were
gone." (Associated Press, via Boston Globe, 12-07-98)
[former link
*http://www.boston.com/dailynews/wirehtml/341/Records_from_busing_case_give_glimp.shtml ]
School Busing Fading as Key Issue, by Beth Daley, 01/19/99 (dead link)
"The day after Mayor Thomas M. Menino announced a neighborhood school plan last week
that would effectively end student busing in Boston, not one person came to a School
Committee meeting to object.
"A court case that could mean the dismantling of the entire student assignment
system, which uses race as one of the factors in assigning students to city schools, was
met with only tepid protests by a handful of minority leaders last month.
"When a series of public hearings was held last year on possible changes in the
student assignment policy, fewer than 10 parents attended each session.
"Busing is rapidly unraveling in Boston, but recent developments have failed to spark
the angry debates, the stormy protests, or unbridled passions that accompanied the
historic 1974 court ruling ordering Boston's schools to be integrated." (Boston
Globe, 01/19/99, by Beth Daley)
[former link
*http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/019/metro/School_busing_fading_as_key_issue+.shtml]
Voluntary Busing Running Out of Gas, by Brian Weber, 01/21/99 (dead link)
"The end of busing [has] allowed Denver kids to attend their neighborhood school or
choose another one that had enough room. Most teachers and parents were relieved when the
court gave up control of the district. They wanted to create good schools near home,
not far away," Bennie Milliner, a board member, said.
"For the past three years minority students in northwest and northeast Denver could
ride a bus to predominantly white schools in southern parts of the city. However, the
number of riders has dropped from 402 in 1996 to 196 this year at a cost per student of
$1,600 -- three times the district average for busing. 'I don't know how we can
justify that,' Milliner said." (InsideDenver.Com, 01/21/99)
[former link
**http://insidedenver.com/news/0121vol3.shtml]
Busing in Boston Could
Give Way to "Walk-To Schools", by Robin
Estrin, 01/23/99
"Twenty-five years after racial violence erupted in Boston over court-ordered
desegregation, the city is considering abandoning widespread busing and sending students
to their neighborhood schools again. The reason: White flight and a burgeoning
immigrant population have dramatically changed the racial makeup in many parts of Boston.
"Blacks, Hispanics and Asians now constitute about 85 percent of the city's 64,000
public school students, up from about 48 percent when busing began. As a result,
most areas of the city - including the once lily-white South Boston, where the worst
trouble took place in the early 1970s - are now racially and ethnically diverse.
"The change has prompted Mayor Thomas M. Menino to propose building five new schools
in the city and returning to 'walk-to schools.' " (Associated Press, via
Cleveland Live, 01/23/99, by Robin Estrin)
[link http://www.cleveland.com:80/news/pdnews/metro/w23busi.ssf
]
As
Boston changes, it may end busing (01/23/99)
"Twenty-five years after racial violence erupted in Boston over court-ordered
desegregation, the city is considering abandoning widespread busing and sending students
to their neighborhood schools again.
"The reason: White flight and a burgeoning immigrant population have dramatically
changed the racial makeup in many parts of Boston.
"Blacks, Hispanics and Asians now constitute about 85 percent of the city's 64,000
public school students, up from about 48 percent when busing began.
"As a result, most areas of the city -- including the once lily-white South Boston,
where the worst trouble took place in the early 1970s -- are now racially and ethnically
'diverse.' " (Spokane.Net, 01/23/99, from wire services)
[link http://www.spokane.net:80/news-story-body.asp?Date=012399&ID=s519419&cat=
]
Maryland
(Prince Georges County):
Judge Orders End to Forced Busing (09/02/98 - dead
link)
"A federal judge has ordered an end to mandatory busing at Prince Georges
County Schools in Maryland, concluding a 26-year effort to achieve racial balance.
Transportation Director Ken Savoid praised the decision, saying court-ordered
desegregation in the Washington, D.C., suburb no longer makes sense. 'Its costly and
serves no purpose,' he said.
" 'When busing started in 1973, what you basically saw was busloads of white and
black kids passing each other,' Savoid said. 'Now you see only black kids
passing each other. Theyre going from one predominantly black neighborhood to a
school in another predominantly black neighborhood.'
"The agreement approved by U.S. District Judge Peter J. Messitte phases out mandatory
busing over the next six years and calls for the construction of 13 neighborhood schools
and the refurbishing of existing ones. Beginning next year, students will begin returning
to neighborhood schools, though they will have the option of staying in their current
schools." (School Bus News, 09/02/98)
[former link
**http://www.schoolbusfleet.com/News/nws090298.htm]
| Related: Prince George's County to Pay $500,000 to the NAACP (03/09/99) (dead link)
Nice work if you can get it. In honor of ending court ordered school busing in this
Maryland suburb of Washington, DC, Prince George's County has agreed to pay $500,000 in
legal fees which the NAACP incurred in fighting against the county. Black,
democratic County Executive Wayne Curry had been prepared to spend up to $2 million to
resolve the case. Said council member Walter H. Maloney "There was no
justification for it" and that payment to the NAACP sends a message that the county
is a "cash cow" for other litigants, according to the Washington Post.
In addition, the county spent $638,000 on its own law firm as well as $99,557 to two
expert witnesses. (Washington Post, 03/09/99, page B04, by Jackie Spinner)
[former link
*http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1999-03/09/089l-030999-idx.html ] |
North
Carolina (Charlotte):
Schools Panic Over End of Racial
Quotas and Busing (11/08/99 - dead
link)
[This Washington Post
story portrays the end of forced school busing in this community as if it were a negative
thing. Rather than celebrating the long overdue arrival of non-racial criteria in
determining where grade schoolers can attend class, this Post story gives the impression
that the release from a court-ordered, race-based busing program is somehow bad for the
students of the Charlotte-Mecklenberg school system. Editor]
Washington Post headline: Charlotte Schools Are Scrambling
-- Story: "A recent federal court ruling has thrown the old way of doing things
here into disarray, challenging school officials and the community to come up with some
smart, fast solutions. In September, U.S. District Judge Robert Potter ruled that the
Charlotte-Mecklenburg system, which is 40 percent black, had achieved desegregation
"quite some time ago" and had eliminated "the vestiges of past
discrimination."
"In effect, Potter freed the schools from nearly 30 years of court supervision
brought by the famed 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg
Board of Education that led to the busing of thousands of local schoolchildren from their
neighborhoods. He also decreed that any measure based on race, including the city's
pioneering busing program, could no longer be a factor in school assignments.
"A divided school board and a group of black leaders have appealed Potter's ruling,
but without a stay from the judge, new school assignments for as many as 60,000 of the
system's 100,000 students will have to be devised fast--for the next fall term.
"The lawsuit propelling this monumental shift was filed in 1997, when a white parent
sued the school board after his daughter was denied entry into an elementary-school magnet
program because she was classified as "nonblack." After the family moved from
the area, six other white parents continued the suit, reasoning that if school officials
would not ask the court to release the system, they would. (Washington Post 11/08/99, page
A03, by Sue Anne Pressley)
[former link
**http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1999-11/08/077l-110899-idx.html]
Busing
debate comes full circle (04/18/99 - 04/26/99)
Subhead: Charlotte system faces a federal trial. "Almost 30 years ago,
the Supreme Court turned Charlotte, N.C., into ground zero in the debate over school
busing. By affirming an effort to fix the city's history of racial segregation in its
public schools, the high court's decision set off a series of racially charged battles in
other school systems as they followed Charlotte's lead.
"Now, at a trial starting on April 19 in Charlotte, a federal judge will begin
hearing arguments from three sides about whether three decades of integration through
busing, quotas and magnet schools have created a desegregated, or unitary, school system,
or whether the 99,000-student system still has a ways to go.
"It is not the first such challenge, either in Charlotte or elsewhere. But the trial,
expected to last at least a month, is fraught with symbolism that is not lost on the
lawyers involved. "It will be over for those school systems still clinging to
busing as a means of desegregation," predicted Atlanta attorney A. Lee Parks, lead
lawyer for a group of white parents challenging integration policies that kept their
children out of certain magnet schools.
White plaintiffs: "The suit began in 1997 when Charlotte resident William Capacchione
filed a civil rights suit alleging that his Daughter, Cristina, had been denied admission
to a magnet school because she is white. In response, Charlotte lawyer James E.
Ferguson II, who represents the black students who were the original plaintiffs in the
1971 case, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, sought
reactivation of the landmark case. Capacchione, he argued, was a direct attack on its
precedent.
"It was in Swann that a unanimous Supreme Court affirmed a U.S. district court's
power to fashion a remedy that would create a "unitary school system" in
Charlotte as a way of combatting de facto school segregation. Six other parents
joined Capacchione in April 1998. They allege that the Charlotte system achieved unitary
status 10 years ago but that the school board has avoided ending busing, magnet schools
and other race-based programs. The parents seek an injunction, damages and a race-neutral
system." (National Law Journal 04/19/99 - 04/26/99 by David E. Rovella)
[link http://www.ljx.com/cgi-bin/f_cat?prod/ljextra/data/texts/1999_0418_08.html
]
Race-Based School Plan is
Challenged (04/19/99)
"CHARLOTTE, N.C.--A lawsuit filed for a white first-grader threatens school
desegregation policies in Charlotte, N.C., where a landmark ruling 30 years ago cleared
the way for busing to integrate public schools nationwide. The federal trial, set to
open here today, is the latest attack on racial quotas and busing plans drawn up since the
late 1960s by local school boards to end segregation.
"Ultimately, it comes down to whether race can be used to decide which schools
students can attend," Charlotte schools spokesman John Deem said. In 1969,
Charlotte was at ground zero in the explosive desegregation debate after a federal judge
ruled in a landmark case--Swann vs. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education--that schools
could bus students far from home to eliminate segregated neighborhood schools."
(LA Times 04/19/99 from Reuters)
[link http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/NATION/t000035115.1.html
]
Wisconsin
(Milwaukee):
Black and White
Milwaukee Area Residents Oppose Busing (10/17/99)
"Matching a nationwide cultural and constitutional trend, Milwaukee-area residents
strongly oppose the practice of busing children from one neighborhood to another for the
purpose of integration, according to results of an extensive Journal Sentinel poll on
education issues.
"Of the 800 adults polled this month in the metropolitan Milwaukee area, 73% said
they did not support busing for integration - a resounding condemnation of two decades'
worth of social policy in the city.
"Opposition to busing was slightly less strong among respondents who live in the city
(66%) but still represented a solid majority. By race, 78% of white respondents opposed
busing; 56% of blacks opposed the policy.
"The poll was conducted for the newspaper by the Public Policy Forum and
Lein/Speigelhoff Inc. of Brookfield between Sept. 24 and Oct. 11.
"It also asked participants about a provision in the new state budget intended to end
most busing in Milwaukee and divert the money to pay for bonds to build and enhance
neighborhood schools in the city.
"About 70% of the respondents supported the Neighborhood Schools Plan, with similar
support coming from city residents. (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 10/17/99 by Joe
Williams and Alan J. Borsuk)
[link http://www.jsonline.com/news/metro/oct99/poll18101799a.asp
]
Area residents oppose busing
for integration, poll finds (10/17/99 - dead link)
"Matching a nationwide cultural and constitutional trend, Milwaukee-area residents
strongly oppose the practice of busing children from one neighborhood to another for the
purpose of integration, according to results of an extensive Journal Sentinel poll on
education issues. Of the 800 adults polled this month in the metropolitan Milwaukee area,
73% said they did not support busing for integration - a resounding condemnation of two
decades' worth of social policy in the city.
"Opposition to busing was slightly less strong among respondents who live in the city
(66%) but still represented a solid majority. By race, 78% of white respondents opposed
busing; 56% of blacks opposed the policy. .... Black respondents were somewhat less
enthusiastic, with 61% supporting the plan. But 77% of Hispanic respondents said they
supported the plan....
"While support for busing was low, respondents in the poll still expressed some
desire to have racially integrated schools for their children. Asked to indicate the
importance of school integration on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being least important and 5
most important, respondents overall averaged 3.41. African-American respondents gave the
matter the most importance, averaging 4.08. In another question, participants were asked
where they thought minority children tended to get the best education; 51% of overall
respondents said in a racially integrated school; 20% said in a non-integrated school; and
18% said it made no difference what kind of school the child attended. When asked where
white students tended to get the best education, slightly fewer respondents (44%) listed a
racially integrated school." (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 10/17/99 by Joe
Williams and Alan J. Borsuk)
[former link:
**http://www.onwis.com/news/metro/oct99/poll18101799.asp]
The Enstrom Foundation's Efforts
to Oppose Busing (undated, reference historical)
"In June of 1977 thirty-five people met in response to a note posted by a fellow
citizen at the entrance to the Scripps Ranch area of San Diego. This note had reminded
them that their children were faced with "some sort of mandatory busing
assignment," arising from a "desegregation" class action filed in 1967
known as the Carlin case.
"They had reason to be
concerned because their school board seemed to be preparing them for the forced busing of
their children away from their neighborhood schools in meetings "staged" by the
district, as described by this citizen:
"...The whole tenor of the
meeting was get ready because it's [busing] coming and there is nothing you can do
about it. That was the way it was presented. Make whatever accommodations you have to but
just accept it.
"During this same period in
1977, the author of this book, a retired federal magistrate judge, via TV was watching
vigorous opposition by Los Angeles citizens to the mandatory busing of their children in
the course of a similar action there. It struck him that the exercise of this governmental
affirmative action, mandating school assignments based on the race of the assignee,
violated the rights of those unwillingly subjected to it.
"Accordingly, the author
expressed his views in a commentary titled Busing, Not Integration, Opposed, published in
the September 18, 1977 issue of The San Diego Union. Upon learning of this controversy,
the group calling themselves "Groundswell" obtained his assistance on a pro bono
basis to voice their objections to forced busing by intervention on
December 15, 1980, which he continuously rendered until the jurisdiction of the Court over
the San Diego school district was ended on July 1, 1998 upon his motion. Court of Appeal
Ruling February 9, 1998 at California Court
Information.
"There remain throughout the
United States school districts under judicial control where persons unwillingly are
subjected to, or face, coercive race-based student assignments in
"desegregation" class actions to which they are not parties. The author details
for them the lengthy "Groundswell" experience to enable them to similarly
successfully assert individually the full range of their legal objections to such
discrimination.
"Underlying the
"Groundswell" objections is the interpretation of our Constitution in the famous
Plessy dissent of Justice Harlan that it is color-blind and does not permit such
governmental action against persons innocent of any offense against the plaintiff-class
seeking its imposition.
"The author also offers this
reasoned opposition to race-based affirmative action in public schools to the dialogue
invited by the President's Initiative on Race." (Enstrom Foundation by Elmer
Enstrom, Jr.)
[link http://www.enstrom-foundation.org/General/Summary.html
]
In
Memoriam (Fondly or Bitterly)
Judge Arthur W. Garrity is Dead
W.A. Garrity; Judge
Desegregated Boston Schools (09/18/99)
Judge Arthur Garrity Jr., is dead. He died of cancer on Thursday, Sept. 16,
1999.
Judge Garrity became infamous for his judicial order 25 years ago to force racial busing
upon Boston's public school children. His questionable impostion of his own liberal,
judicial social engineering was directly responsible for mob violence and an unwarranted
image of Boston parents as "bigots" simply because Boston parents objected to
busing their kids to a distant school to satisfy a liberal judge's notion of "racial
parity".
Garrity's order, while based upon good intentions (albeit uninformed, misdirected
intentions) directly caused an unprecedented flight of middle-class parents of school age
kids from Boston's public school districts. Garrity's historic busing order greatly
accelerated the decline of Boston's inner city public schools by driving "white"
parents with school age children from the city into the distant suburbs.
Today, 25 years later, Boston parents -- minority and non-minority alike -- loudly
repudiate the notion that their children should be the pawns of experimental and unproven
government social engineering programs such as the failed forced racial busing program
Garrity held so dear. After a quarter-century of forced busing, Boston parents
almost universally want to send their kids to neighborhood schools close to home -- a goal
which Judge Garrity's historic and ill-considered order effectively made impossible to
achieve.
As reported by the Los Angeles Times on 9/18/99: "Garrity's death at 79 came
two months after the Boston school board voted to end busing for integration, 25 years
after Garrity's order launched a tumultuous period in the city's history.
"The Boston desegregation case was considered a watershed because it occurred in a
northern city and because it provoked violence. At the time, some experts considered
it the most important school desegregation case since federal troops were called to Little
Rock's Central High School in 1957."
Judge Arthur W. Garrity has passed away. We feel badly for his family and
friends. Death by cancer or any other disease is unpleasant. While Judge
Garrity had a great mind, he suffered from a misdirected, liberal, anti-white bias in his
judicial rulings.
While we mourn with Garrity's family over his untimely death, we hope that Judge Garrity's
bias against race-blind educational principles is also dead. Judge Garrity's rulings
from the Federal Bench clearly indicated that he felt that white kids were to be held
responsible for the racial discimination allegedly practiced by their great-great
grandparents. Like many other great, liberal judges, Artuhur W. Garrity failed to
apply the principle of "equal protection without regard to race or gender" to
white kids. While we might miss Garrity's great mind, we may never be able to
forgive him for his bias against white children. (Based on the Los Angeles Times
09/18/99 by Elaine Woo)
[link http://www.latimes.com/CNS_DAYS/990918/t000083566.html
]
| RELATED: In the post-Garrity era, dare we forget the lessons
of the past? (09/26/99 - dead link)
"The passing last week of US Court Judge W. Arthur Garrity Jr. marked the end of a
symbolic era in Boston, a time of chaos and controversy over school desegregation. Now,
with the next round of city elections, we face a choice: either move the city's
educational system forward - or return it to the days of school segregation that prompted
Judge Garrity to order a massive busing program. With some merit, critics say
Garrity's decision to desegregate the city's schools was disruptive, if not destructive,
to the way things were.
"No doubt, busing brought hardship and frustration to many parents, as well
as to the students previously enrolled in schools close to their homes. Of
course, there always has been busing in Boston, but the buses went largely where parents
wanted them to go - some to segregated schools far from their own neighborhoods - and no
one complained.
"But Garrity's order caused a racial explosion that exposed to the nation a legendary
Northern city's [alleged] racism. A spotlight was cast on our [allegedly]
deliberately segregated public schools, and how they rendered an inferior education to
thousands of black students." (Boston Globe 09/26/99 by Robert A. Jordan)
[former link **http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/269/focus/
In_the_post_Garrity_era_dare_we_forget_the_lessons_of_the_past_+.shtml] |
END of Busing Special Section |