(4)
Insurance, Greenlining, Redlining
News Stories and Background
Supreme Court: High
Court Refuses Blacks' Redlining Suit (01/19/99 -
no link)
"The Supreme Court today refused to revive a massive civil rights lawsuit against
many of the nation's largest insurance companies filed in behalf of 93,000 homeowners
living in predominantly black neighborhoods of St. Louis and Kansas City. The
justices, without comment, left intact [lower court] rulings that threw out the
case."
"The 1996 lawsuit accused insurance companies of discriminatory 'redlining' --
refusing to sell homeowners insurance on equal terms based on the racial composition of
their neighborhoods." Significantly absent from the press coverage of this
case is any argument that such neighborhoods might actually represent greater risk, and
therefore justify either higher premiums or lower coverage. For example, my
insurance premiums for living in Maryland are significantly lower than if I lived one mile
farther south in Washington, DC. Why is that? It is because violent crime,
vandalism, burglaries, and other property crimes happen at a MUCH higher rate in
Washington, DC than they do in Silver Spring, Maryland! Therefore I pay lower
premiums because I represent a lower risk because I live one mile farther north, in
Maryland. [editor] (Associated Press via PostNet, 01/19/99, by Richard
Carelli)
[former link
*http://web3.stlnet.com/postnet/news/wires.nsf/StateRegion/D1578677F9F151C0862566FE00582E71]
END (4)
Insurance, Greenlining, Redlining |