| Slavery Apology Headed for
Congress (06/13/00)
WASHINGTON "Members of Congress are planning to introduce a resolution next
week that would put the Congress on record apologizing to blacks for 200 years of slavery.
"The resolution, introduced but not passed in the 105th Congress, would apologize for
the role of Congress in establishing and perpetuating slavery until the passage of the
13th Amendment on Jan. 31, 1865.
"... The legislation is likely to be the centerpiece of a "Juneteenth"
celebration and rally on the Capitol grounds June 19. June 19 is the traditional
date celebrated by black Americans as the true date of emancipation because slaves in
Texas, California, Louisiana, Arkansas and Oklahoma were not told of their emancipation
until that day, six months after passage of the 13th Amendment.
"The rally this year is part of a campaign to have Juneteenth declared a national
holiday, though it would not require employers to give workers a paid day off."
(UPI, via NewsMax.com, 06/13/00)
[link http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=2000/6/13/202643
]
Reparations: Yes
or No? (06/09/00)
" What do you think of reparations? If you're not sure, that's understandable.
Reparations probably aren't among the top 10 topics you think about after your feet hit
the floor in the morning. That may soon change. The word is going to get a lot more play
in the nation's capital, especially if Ward 7 council member Kevin Chavous has his way.
The two-term lawmaker and possible D.C. mayoral candidate in 2002 introduced a resolution
this week calling for the country to pay "reparations to the descendants of African
American slaves."
"... Given that timetable, maybe it's time to start mulling over reparations in your
mind. One person who has is Myron Magnet, an editor with the urban policy publication City
Journal and the conservative Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. He does not approve.
In the "Race and Reparations" chapter of his book "The Dream and the
Nightmare," Magnet concedes that two centuries of slavery and another of
discrimination and segregation have produced victims "on a world-historical
scale," black poverty being the most visible reminder.
"But while agreeing that racism has not been expunged from the fabric of American
life, Magnet maintains that the force of the civil rights movement and the '64 Civil
Rights Act have knocked down most barriers blocking blacks from the economic mainstream.
Reparations are not the answer for those who haven't made it, he suggests. Magnet says
reparations rest on an ideology of victimization, a hopelessly self-defeating notion
because it assumes African Americans are too damaged by racism, too much the helpless
victims of a grossly unfair society, to seize and make the most of the opportunities now
available.
"If poor blacks are not advancing at a rapid enough pace, counters Magnet, it's not
because they are being put upon by a bad system, but rather because they have been robbed
of responsibility for their fate by welfare and a way of thinking that encourages them to
feel entitled to restitution, including advancement on the "basis of racial
preference rather than mere personal striving and merit."
"To which, as might be imagined, reparations proponents Randall Robinson of
TransAfrica and African American economist Richard America have much to say in response.
"The destructive moral crime that began in Jamestown in 1619 has yet to end"
writes Robinson, in his latest book: "The Debt--What America Owes to Blacks." He
cites "an unbroken story line of evidence" from slavery to contemporary America
that documents the massive wrongs and social injuries inflicted upon African
Americans.
. Is someone shouting: "Why should sons and daughters be held
responsible for the sins of their fathers?"
"Richard America responds. "We are not accountable for our fathers' actions. But
we are responsible for our own sins. One of those sins is accepting and keeping inherited
benefits that were wrongfully bequeathed to us as members of a large class, that helped
deprive other people of their rightful place," America writes in his book,
"Paying the Social Debt: What White America Owes Black America."
"
Reparations? Today, because of how Gwen spends her working hours, we find
ourselves in a tax bracket which, for someone like me who simply types for a living,
borders on embarrassing. If I'm entitled to reparations (and that's a stretch), just give
my share to Jubilee Jobs, Healthy Babies and the NAACP. That said, this nation has a
shameful history of exclusion that it has a moral obligation to remedy. But this is more
than "a black thing." Count many Hispanics, native Americans, Asian Americans,
and poor whites among the aggrieved, too. Remediating economic and social inequalities
rooted in race, gender, sexual orientation and class remains an inescapable duty of a just
society. And government ought to be proactive, not passive." (Washington Post, Page
A23, by Colbert I. King)
[link http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32327-2000Jun9.html
]
Black Pharaohs and Reparations
(06/08/00)
[In this article, author Richard Poe explores the
ancient, pre-U.S. slave trade practiced by Egypt.]
"LIKE MOST AMERICANS, I am appalled at the prospect of having to pay reparations to
blacks. But my reason for being appalled is somewhat different from the mainstream. Having
written a book about the relationship between Europe and Africa in ancient times, I have
learned that whites might have just as much reason to demand reparations from blacks as
the other way around.
"My book Black Spark, White Fire points out that the ancient Egyptians were a mixed
people, at least partly black, a fact which no anthropologist disputes. According to the
one-drop rule favored in America, partly black means black.
"Egypt was the dominant imperial power of its day. It subdued and enslaved
neighboring peoples. Under the conquering pharaoh Thutmose III (1479 1425 B.C.),
Egypt's vast empire stretched from deep in the Sudan to the Euphrates River in Syria.
"My book takes the controversial position that the Egyptians were also accomplished
seafarers, whose war fleets may have reached Greece, parts of which they conquered and
colonized.
"There is real evidence for such a conquest. Greek legend holds that an Egyptian king
named Danaos landed in the Peloponnese with a great fleet, made himself ruler, and ordered
the natives to call themselves "Danaans" in his honor. In the earliest writings
of the Greeks the epics of Homer Greeks do not call themselves Greeks or
Hellenes, but Danaans.
"...Black people seem to enjoy contemplating the possibility that their kinsmen may
have conquered, enslaved and ruled Europeans. And why shouldn't they? It is only human to
idolize the conqueror, the explorer, the colonizer, the empire builder. Blacks are no
different from whites in admiring this sort of behavior. Deference toward the conqueror is
encoded in our genes.
"Yet many blacks who have read my book seem not to realize that the sword cuts both
ways. They exult in their own ancestors' conquests readily enough. But then they turn
around and tell whites that we must be ashamed of similar aggression in our ancestors.
"One such selective reader is Randall Robinson. In his book The Debt, Robinson
actually uses my book to prop up his argument that whites owe blacks huge cash reparations
for past wrongs. ...In Robinson's view, the failure of European scholars to fully
acknowledge Egypt's greatness constitutes an insult, just one more in a long list of
grievances for which whites must now pay.
"It is true that Western scholars have given Egypt less credit than it deserves. But
Robinson overlooks a more important lesson of Black Spark, White Fire, which is that white
people are not the only ones who have conquered, colonized and enslaved their neighbors.
"If black people truly believe that their ancestors conquered parts of Europe
and judging from the enthusiastic response to my book, it seems that many do then
perhaps it's time we just called it even. No people, it would seem, can claim
innocence." (Richard Poe in FrontPagemag.com, June 8, 2000)
[link http://www.frontpagemag.com/poe/poe06-08-00p.htm
]
Richard Poe's book "Black Spark, White
Fire" is available from Amazon.com at:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0761521631/centerforthest01A/
A Game of Racial Envy (06/07/00)
[FrontPage reader Johnny Reb responds to
Horowitz]
"MR. HOROWITZ, you really should not go so easy on Mr. Hutchinson and the other
grievance-mongers of slavery. Of course, one can only go so far in this argument without
appearing pro-slavery, but you really ought to consider pushing the argument a little
further along...
"1. In their monumental study of slavery, ``Time on the Cross," Fogel and
Engerman estimated that roughly 85 percent of the economic output of American slave labor
was consumed by the slaves themselves in the form of food, clothing, et cetera...
"2. As Fogel and Engerman further demonstrate, the conditions of African slavery in
the American South were the mildest of any place in the New World. Cuba, Brazil and other
Caribbean slave economies were forced to continually import slaves because the death rate
was so high on the tropical plantations...
"3. The idea that, because their ancestors were held as chattels in the United States
over the course of a century or two, that modern blacks are entitled to some compensation
for that experience, is absurd...
"4. All of Hutchinson's argument along the line of ``blacks are bad off in the United
States'' begs the question: Compared to what? Are blacks worse off in the United States
compared to blacks in Cuba, Kenya, Sierra Leone, Eritrea? Are they worse off than Asians
in Indonesia, Chinese in Communist China, Mexicans in Chiapas, Afghanis under the
Taliban?..." (FrontPageMag.com, 06-07-00 by Johnny Reb)
[link http://frontpagemag.com/dh/2000/reb06-07-00.htm
]
Reparations Are Still A Bad Idea
(06/05/00)
[In this Front Page Magazine piece, author David
Horowitz responds to reparations-supporter Earl Ofari Hutchinson.]
"THE STRAW MAN QUESTION "Does Oprah need reparations?" with which Earl
Ofari Hutchinson begins his reply to my article "10 Reasons Why Reparations for
Blacks is a Bad Idea for Blacks-and Racist too" is a Salon.com tag line, not anything
I wrote. Anyone reading my argument who intended to frame a responsible reply to it, would
have seen that clearly.
"I brought up the case of Oprah to highlight a problem with one of the central claims
of the reparations' camp - that blacks alive today still suffer significant damage from a
system of slavery that was ended 135 years ago, and from the regime of segregation that
was brought to a close 35 years ago, and that other Americans should pay them
compensation.
"Or, even if it could be proved that they do so suffer, that Americans should pay
them more compensation than the trillions of dollars they have already provided in the
form of welfare and other transfer payments and in special privileges afforded by the
racial preference arrangements called affirmative action.
"The invocation of Oprah was only to point out the tip of an iceberg. The existence
of millions of very successful, middle-class African Americans refutes the idea that the
deprivations of the black underclass are, in fact, caused by any historical forces like
slavery and segregation...
"Hutchinson's failure to deal with the argument I actually put forward unfortunately
is not unique to this aspect of his reply, but pretty much sums up the "reply"
itself. One gross instance of this failure is his unsupported claim that my 10 reasons are
really only 4. Since he provides no argument that this is so, the claim merely allows him
to dispense with 6 of my arguments without really dispensing with them." (Front
Page Magazine, 06-05-00, by David Horowitz)
[link http://frontpagemag.com/dh/2000/david06-05-00.htm
]
David Fights The Racial Goliath
(06/02/00)
[FrontPage Magazine writer Robert A. George
examines David Horowitz's position on reparations.]
" ONE OF THE MANY HATS that prolific author David Horowitz wears is columnist with
the online magazine Salon. Horowitz clearly enjoys being the house provocateur on a site
that many would consider liberal (though it does publish a few right-of-center views,
including, ahem, those of your humble columnist). Horowitz takes particular glee in
tackling issues of race.
"As his best-selling autobiography, Radical Son, attests, the former lefty comes to
his current positions honestly. He was there on the front lines (or perhaps we should say,
"ramparts," to use the title of his New Left '60s journal) of the counterculture
revolution. He hung with the Black Panthers, whom he now castigates with the venom of a
reformed smoker. Actually, he goes well beyond that - he recites chapter and verse the
crimes (murder, among them) of the Panthers.
"His current book, Hating Whitey, is largely a collection of his race-focused Salon
essays. Horowitz's latest column tackles the "reparations" debate. He notes
correctly that, whereas a few years ago, only a few marginal individuals seriously
discussed the idea of America paying reparations to American blacks for slavery, the idea
is now gaining traction.
"Randall Robinson, long-time leader of TransAfrica, has written a book entitled The
Debt: What America Owes To Blacks that tries to make the case. Horowitz lists ten reasons
why this is a bad idea. On the whole, he is correct.
"...One point that Horowitz does not mention is one that several blacks - and not
just conservatives either - have raised. How do you seriously put an economic figure on
the totality of the degradation that occurred during the slave trade? Slavery - and Jim
Crow, which followed it - was not just a simple taking of property and unfair internment
as happened with the Japanese in World War II. It was the separation of families and
dehumanization on an unequaled level...." (Front Page Magazine, 6-2-00, by
Robert A. George)
[link http://frontpagemag.com/dh/2000/george06-06-00.htm
]
10 Reasons Why Reparations For
Blacks Are A Bad Idea For Blacks And Racist, Too (05/30/00)
Author and racial historian David Horowitz writes: "IT BEGAN AS a fringe
proposition favored by the politically extreme. But the idea that taxpayers should pay
reparations to black Americans for the damages of slavery and segregation is no longer a
fixation of the political margin. It is fast becoming the next big "civil
rights" thing. Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., has already introduced legislation to set
up a commission that would examine the impact of slavery as a foreordained prelude to some
kind of legislated payback. (Conyers will become chairman of the Judiciary Committee if
Democrats win back the House.) A coalition of African-Americans is claiming a debt of $4.1
trillion. A coalition of African nations is claiming a debt of $777 trillion against an
assortment of governments including the United States.
"So what is wrong with the idea? In truth, just about everything. Examined closely,
the claim for reparations is factually tendentious, morally incoherent and racially
incendiary. Logically, it has about as much substance as the suggestion that O.J. Simpson
should have been acquitted because of past racism by the criminal courts. Its impact on
race relations and on the self-isolation of the African-American community is likely to be
even worse.
"If the reparations idea continues to gain traction, its most obvious effect will be
to intensify ethnic antagonisms and generate new levels of racial resentment. It will
further alienate African-Americans from their American roots and further isolate them from
all of America's other communities (including whites), who are themselves blameless in the
grievance of slavery, who cannot be held culpable for racial segregation and who, in fact,
have made significant contributions to ending discrimination and redressing any lingering
injustice."
"America's black citizens are the richest and most privileged black people
alivea bounty that is a direct result of the heritage that is under attack. The
American idea needs the support of its African-American citizens. But African-Americans
also need the support of the American idea.
"Dredging up a new reason to assault this idea is not in the interest of
African-Americans. What would serve the African-American community better would be to
reject the political left as represented by people like Robinson, Jesse Jackson and every
black leader who endorses this claim. What African-Americans need is to embrace America as
their home and to defend its good: the principles and institutions that have set
themand all of usfree." (Salon.com, by David Horowitz, 05-31-00)
[link http://www.frontpagemag.com/dh/2000/dh05-31-00p.htm
]
It's Futile to Put a Price on
Slavery (05/29/00 Pay Site)
[New York Times writer Glenn C. Loury reports on
reparations.]
"BOSTON -- A visit to any courthouse, public hospital emergency room or welfare
office in a large city confirms that our society is still marred by the social and
economic disadvantage of African-Americans.
"Yet, with overt racial discrimination less prevalent nowadays, many Americans are
asking why a concern about social deprivation should take particular notice of race. This
is a fair question.
"One answer is that black disadvantage remains a special problem because it
originates from slavery, to which there is this conservative retort: "So what?
Slavery ended a long time ago." This has prompted a new demand from advocates of
African-American interests: reparations, a money settlement that is to be given as
compensation for past racial injury. Prominent intellectuals, including Charles Ogletree,
a professor at Harvard Law School, and Henry Louis Gates, chairman of Harvard's
Afro-American studies department, were considering a class-action lawsuit asking for
reparations, according to a March article in The Boston Globe.
"Although I am not without sympathy for this position, I believe that framing the
argument in these terms is a mistake. We need some reckoning with the racist past, but
reparations encourage the wrong kind of reckoning. Winning compensation would, in the end,
allow conservatives to get away with their "so what?" retort.
"... The tort-law model underlying reparations advocacy -- he who causes damage to
another is obliged to make the injured party whole -- is hopelessly insufficient here. It
relies heavily upon being able to demonstrate in quantitative terms the nature and extent
of injury. How would one even begin to arrive at a sum for the reparation payments? Who
can say what the out-of-wedlock birth rate for blacks would be, absent chattel slavery?
How does one calculate the cost of inner-city ghettos, of poor education, of the stigma of
perceived racial inferiority? The severity of slavery's "injury" is far more
profound than any cash transfer will be able to reverse.
"Moreover, reparations would allow the majority of Americans to look at the situation
as one where "we" do something for "them"-- alleviate their suffering,
solve their problems, quiet their protests and then, once the debt is paid off, wash our
hands of society's inequities.
"Instead, we should follow another model, one that decrees that "we,"
meaning all Americans, should right the inequity for the sake of our country. We must
attend to this matter so that our national fellowship and comity will not be emaciated, so
that our moral pronouncements on the world stage will not be made into a hollow
mockery. (New York Times 05-29-00 by Glenn C. Loury)
[link to subscription/PAY site: http://www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day/oped/29lour.html
]
Reparations
idea won't fix the past (05/24/00)
[Orlando Sentinel reporter David Porter examines
reparations in this article.]
"...[T]he Self Determination Committee [is] pushing a national campaign to demand
that every black person who is a descendant of African slaves receive $500,000 in
reparations to pay for our ancestors' uncompensated labor -- slavery -- and the pure
misery of enslavement.
"Even if it was assumed that only half of today's African-Americans were descendants
of African slaves, the reparations bill would be nearly $9 trillion. To put those numbers
in perspective, Congress in April approved a $1.8 trillion federal budget for the 2001
fiscal year.
"During the next few weeks expect to hear more about this subject, because a rally
advocating reparations will take center stage during the Juneteenth celebration set for
June 17 and 18 at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C.
"The Juneteenth observance is as significant to African-Americans as the Fourth of
July is to all Americans. Juneteenth marks June 19, 1865 -- the day when slaves in Texas
learned about the Emancipation Proclamation that set them free. ...it's important for all
Americans -- regardless of ethnicity -- to celebrate the impressive progress that has been
achieved. Celebrating those gains and working on the future seems to make a lot more sense
than investing in a fruitless battle for $500,000." (The Orlando Sentinel, 05-24-00
by David Porter)
[link http://orlandosentinel.com/automagic/news/2000-05-24/NWSPORT24052400.html
]
When Sorry
Isnt Enough (05/04/00)
Columnist William Raspberry of the Washington Post writes: "What's the proper
response when someone says he's sorry? I guess it depends. The pope recently lamented the
Holocaust, and the response by some Jews was that the lamentation stopped short of an
apology. President Clinton, some three years earlier, considered apologizing for American
slavery, then thought better of it.
"The response from those to whom he would have apologized? Mostly silence. Similarly
when the Maryland House of Delegates in late March rejected a bill that would have asked
Gov. Parris Glendening to apologize for slavery in that state, there was mostly silence
again.
"Now the West African state of Benin is apologizing for its role in the American
slave trade, and, I confess, I don't know what to say. "It's okay, forget it,"
sounds a little too offhand a response to a country that (under its 17th-century name of
Dahomey) may have rounded up as many as 3 million people for sale to slavers. The
18-member Beninese delegation, visiting Richmond and Washington on behalf of President
Mathieu Kerekou, seems perfectly sincere in tendering the apology.
"
Should the rest of us apologize to American Indians for taking their
land--even if we have no intention of returning it? Does it matter that my ancestors
didn't do the taking? Should white Americans apologize to me--on behalf of the American
society--for slavery? But wouldn't that imply that I'm outside the American society?
Otherwise, I end up apologizing to myself, which doesn't make much sense to me. Indeed
none of it makes very much sense to me. If the apology is not followed by remedial
action--compensation, reparations, something--then what's the point?
"If you're truly interested in justice, forget apologizing for something you didn't
do and get busy doing what you can do to help set matters right. Oh yes, President
Kerekou, don't sell any more slaves." (Washington Post, Page A27, by William
Raspberry, 05-05-00)
[link http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8894-2000May4.html
]
Reconsidering an unpaid debt -
Momentum grows for slave reparations (11/22/99 - dead
link)
(MSNBC) "The subject is scalding hot, untouchable as public policy. Even the brave
run from it. And it is only a question: Should the U.S. government pay reparations to the
descendants of slaves?
"Ask one question and it leads to another and another and a few more. Why should
American taxpayers who never owned slaves pay for the sins of ancestors they dont
even know? And what about those whose ancestors arrived here long after slavery ended? And
how would the economy be affected? How do you put a price tag on 2½ centuries of
legalized inhumanity? In what form would reparations be paid? How would you establish
whos a descendant?"
[At this writing, an on-line survey showed that 89% of Americans opposed the concept of
"reparations for prior discrimination against minorities and slaves", while a
paltry 11% favored such reparations. Of course, the survey failed to ask if European
Americans should receive reparations for reverse discrimination. Editor.]
"Questions start debates. Which is all [Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.)] wants. A
raging debate. He is speaking from an anteroom off the floor of the House Judiciary
Committee, which this day is debating, by comparison, something tame
physician-assisted suicide. Conyers is the ranking Democrat on the committee, a 34-year
veteran of Capitol Hill, dean of the Congressional Black Caucus. But these credentials are
not worth diddly when it comes to the subject he has sat down to discuss.
"In every legislative session since 1989, Conyers has introduced a bill that would
establish a commission to examine slavery and its lingering effects on African Americans
and contemporary U.S. society.
"The commission would comprise historians, legal scholars, genealogists, economists,
lawmakers the brightest minds to be found. Hearings would be held across the
country. A report would be issued with recommendations for Congress to act on.
"Should the U.S. government issue a formal apology for sanctioning slavery? Is a debt
owed to the descendants of black people who helped build this country but spent their
lives in forced servitude? These questions would be addressed. "All were
trying to do is compile a body of intelligence and data on the subject," says
Conyers. "The most organized body of material on the subject in American
history."
"You would think a man in his position could at least get a subcommittee hearing on
his bill. But the legislation, known as the Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for
African-Americans Act, has never been debated in Congress. It doesnt matter if
Democrats or Republicans are in charge. The bill just sits.
"Henry Hyde (R-Ill.), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, did not return phone
calls, but heres what he said on the subject several years ago: "The notion of
collective guilt for what people did [200-plus] years ago, that this generation should pay
a debt for that generation, is an idea whose time has gone. I never owned a slave. I never
oppressed anybody. I dont know that I should have to pay for someone who did [own
slaves] generations before I was born." (MSNBC 11/22/99)
[former link **http://www.msnbc.com/news/338401.asp?cp1=1]
Race riot commission considers
reparations (11/22/99 - dead link)
"TULSA, Okla. (AP) A commission investigating the 1921 destruction of Tulsa's
black business district by a white mob took up the issue of reparations Monday, even as it
still asked: Who is to blame?
"The Tulsa Race Riot Commission considered scholarships, museums, memorials and
direct payments to race riot survivors and victims' families as restitution for one of the
nation's worst acts of racial violence. "I think money talks. It shows you're
serious. It's a justice issue,'' said commission member Eddie Faye Gates, who lobbied in
support of payments to survivors. [Eddie Faye Gates did not mention any similar
effort to pay reparations to European American citizens who have suffered from reverse
discrimination at the hands of affirmative action. Editor.]
"Who's at fault here? ... I have not yet seen the evidence that the state of Oklahoma
was culpable,'' said state Rep. Abe Deutschendorf, a Democrat, adding that it would be
difficult to convince others of any state culpability.
"A proposal by the commission's committee on reparations suggested direct payments
based on the precedent set by the Florida Legislature in the case of the 1923 Rosewood
Massacre. Florida awarded victims' families as much as $150,000 each.
"Proposals include 500 scholarships, with a preference given to students living in
affected areas of north Tulsa; funds for an interactive museum in Tulsa detailing the
history of the riot; tax breaks to encourage business development in north Tulsa.
"It is understood that while a valuation of personal and real property is feasible,
no valuation of human life is ever truly feasible or capable of being done,'' said Currie
Ballard, the committee's chairperson." (Associated Press via FoxNews, By AP's
Kelly Kurt, 11/22/99)
[former link
**http://www.foxnews.com/js_index.sml?content=/news/wires2/1122/n_ap_1122_443.sml]
Additional News Links and
Background:
NEWER News storyies about reparations
LINK: http://www.adversity.net/reparations/news1.htm
Johnny Reb, A Game of Racial Envy
(FrontPagemag.com/June 7, 2000)
LINK: http://www.frontpagemag.com/dh/2000/reb06-07-00.htm
Robert A. George, David Fights the Racial
Goliath: Salon's House Provocateur, (National Review/June 2, 2000)
LINK: http://www.frontpagemag.com/dh/2000/david06-06-00.htm
Earl Ofari Hutchinson, Debt Wrong: David
Horowitz is Incorrect. It's Time for the United States to Pay Up for Slavery
(Salon.com/June 5, 2000)
LINK: http://www.frontpagemag.com/dh/2000/hutchinson06-05-00.htm
David Horowitz, Reparations Are Still a
Bad Idea: Reply to Earl Ofari Hutchinson, (FrontPageMag.com/June 5, 2000)
LINK: http://www.frontpagemag.com/dh/2000/david06-05-00.htm
David Horowitz, Ten Reasons Why
Reparations for Blacks are a Bad Idea for Blacks, and Racist Too (FrontPageMag.com/June 5,
2000)
LINK: http://www.frontpagemag.com/dh/2000/dh05-31-00.htm
END Reparations OLDER News Summaries and Links |