1. Overview
[Adversity.Net Report
Nov. 14, 2003] -- In
March of 2002 the Frederick County Board of County Commissioners became aware that the
County's Department of Aging was engaging in the practice of categorizing, classifying,
distinguishing or otherwise identifying consumers of the Department's services on the
basis of race. |

Frederick County, Maryland is
located about 40 miles north of Washington, DC. |

John "Lennie" Thompson, Jr. |
Frederick County
Commissioner John "Lennie" Thompson didn't think that the county had any
business classifying the county's senior citizens by skin color. He proposed a
resolution that would have directed the Department of Aging to cease and desist from the
practice. The Commission rejected his resolution.
Then, earlier this year, Thompson discovered that officials at Walkersville High School in
Frederick County had called only minority students out of class to a
special assembly. School officials called "Asian, African American, Pacific
Islander and Hispanic" to the auditorium. |
| The purpose of the
minority-only student assembly was to invite the students to join the school's
multicultural club.
Mr. Thompson maintains that such a practice represents a departure from the holding in Brown
v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954): "[I]n the field of public education
the doctrine of 'separate but equal' has no place." 347 U.S. at 495.
As President of the Frederick County Board of Commissioners, Mr. Thompson drafted the
"Racial Equality Act" (see below) which, if adopted by the Commission, would get
the County out of the business of classifying it's residents according to their skin
color. |
Frederick
County Story Index:
|
|
Demographics:
Frederick County is one of the fastest growing suburbs of Washington, DC. The
past 10 years have seen a large influx of Washington, DC commuters to this once rural
Maryland county. According to the 2000 Census, Frederick County has a very small
minority population. 90.2% of Frederick County residents categorized themselves as
"white" in the census.
Frederick County, Maryland:
Total Population |
Whites |
Blacks |
Native Americans and Alaskan Natives |
Asians |
Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders |
Mixed Race |
209,125 |
188,659 |
13,344 |
464 |
3,870 |
90 |
2,698 |
100.0% |
90.2% |
6.4% |
0.2% |
1.9% |
0.04% |
1.3% |
Source:
2000 Census
2.
Thompson's Memo to Commissioners
In this memo,
President Thompson explains his rationale for the "Racial Equality Act" to his
fellow Frederick County commissioners.
(Reprinted verbatim with permission.)
SUBJECT:
Proposed Frederick County Racial Equality Act
"Fellow Commissioners:
"My proposed Frederick County Racial Equality Act (the "Act") is attached
for your review and comment. If enacted, the Act would eventually require County Divisions
and Departments to refrain from the practice of categorizing, classifying, distinguishing,
or otherwise identifying citizens on the basis of race unless the BOCC [Board of County
Commissioners] expressly determines that the practice is narrowly tailored to serve a
compelling governmental interest.
| "The Act
allows County Divisions and Departments a certain period of time to present what I call a
"Nuremberg defense" (i.e., a claim that the practice is required by higher ups).
[See particularly "Definition of the
Nuremberg Defense" -- opens a new window.] The BOCC [Board of County Commissioners]
would evaluate a Department's claim that a federal or state statute, regulation, rule,
grant condition or other authority purportedly requires the practice. If the BOCC
expressly determines that a particular practice was narrowly tailored to serve a
compelling governmental interest, then the practice could continue. Otherwise, the
practice must cease. |
Frederick
County Story Index:
|
|
"The moral authority and legitimacy of governmental race-based distinctions are at
their zenith when expressly required by an act of the United States Congress passed in
accordance with its powers under the Civil War Amendments to eliminate the badges and
incidents of slavery. On the other hand, the authority and legitimacy of race-based
distinctions are at their nadir when performed on the basis of some bureaucratic grant
writer's perverse obsession that all of society's benefits and burdens be allocated on the
basis of a strict racial quota system. I believe we will find far more examples of the
latter than of the former.
"Over the years at least three members of the present U.S. Supreme Court have
expressed concern about the specter of a government bureaucrat, clipboard and pencil in
hand, attempting to pigeonhole consumers of government services into pre-determined racial
categories:
"[T]he very attempt to define with precision a beneficiary's qualifying racial
characteristics is repugnant to our constitutional ideals. . . If the National Government
is to make a serious effort to define racial classes by criteria that can be administered
objectively, it must study precedents such a The First Regulation to the Reich's
Citizenship Law of November 14, 1935, translated in 4 Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression,
Document No. 1417-PS. pp. 8-9 (1946)." Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448,
534, footnote 5 (1980) (Stevens, J., dissenting); Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC,
497 U.S. 547, 633, footnote 1 (1990) (Kennedy, J. and Scalia, J., dissenting).
"My interest in this topic came about in March, 2002 when the prior BOCC learned that
the County's Department of Aging was engaging in the practice of categorizing,
classifying, distinguishing or otherwise identifying consumers of the Department's
services on the basis of race. I proposed a resolution that would have directed the
Department of Aging to cease and desist from the practice. On September 24, 2002
Commissioner Rhoderick moved to reject the proposed resolution, seconded by Commissioner
Gardner. Commissioners Gardner, Rhoderick & Weldon voted in favor of the motion to
reject the resolution, with Commissioners Gray & Thompson opposed to the motion.
"The recent revelation that officials at Walkersville High School called students to
an assembly on the basis of race has brought the topic to the fore once again. The
practice represents a departure from the holding in Brown v. Board of Education,
347 U.S. 483 (1954): "[I]n the field of public education the doctrine of 'separate
but equal' has no place." 347 U.S. at 495. [See Gazette story
9/25/03.]
"If there is to be a movement away from the cavalier use of governmental race-based
classifications and toward racial equality, it is quite appropriate (and ironic) that it
begin here in Frederick County. We tread over the same ground as did Roger Brooke Taney,
Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court and author of Dred Scott v. Sandford,
60 U.S. 393 (1857), perhaps the most irresponsible and racist decision ever rendered by
the Supreme Court.
"Your opinions and commentary are welcome."
-- (Signed)
"Lennie" [John "Lennie" Thompson, Jr., President, Frederick County
Board of County Commissioners]
3.
Text of the "Racial Equality Act"
Below is the exact
text of the proposed "Racial Equality Act" which Frederick County commission
president Thompson is proposing.
TEXT OF THE ACT
RESOLUTION #03-
________________
A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, MARYLAND
("BOCC") DIRECTING ALL DIVISIONS AND DEPARTMENTS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE
BOCC TO CEASE, DESIST AND REFRAIN FROM THE PRACTICE OF CATEGORIZING, CLASSIFYING,
DISTINGUISHING OR IDENTIFYING CITIZENS ON THE BASIS OF RACE UNLESS THE BOCC EXPRESSLY
DETERMINES THAT THE PRACTICE IS NARROWLY TAILORED TO SERVE A COMPELLING GOVERNMENTAL
INTEREST.
RECITALS
WHEREAS,
"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they
will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character;"1 and
| WHEREAS, "Distinctions between citizens solely because of
their ancestry are by their very nature odious to a free people whose institutions are
founded upon the doctrine of equality;"2
and WHEREAS,
"Classifying persons according to their race is more likely to reflect racial
prejudice than legitimate public concerns; the race, not the person, dictates the
category;"3 and
WHEREAS,
"At the heart of the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection lies the simple
command that the Government must treat citizens as individuals, not as simply components
of a racial, religious, sexual or national class;"4
and |
Frederick
County Story Index:
|
|
WHEREAS, "Of all the criteria by which men and women can be judged,
the most pernicious is that of race;"5
and
WHEREAS,
"an explicit policy of assignment by race may serve to stimulate our society's latent
race consciousness, suggesting the utility and propriety of basing decisions on a factor
that ideally bear no relationship to an individual's worth or needs...;"6 and
WHEREAS,
"One of the principal reasons race is treated as a forbidden classification is that
it demeans the dignity and worth of a person to be judged by ancestry instead of his or
her own merit and essential qualities;"7
and
WHEREAS,
racial classifications "
threaten to stigmatize individuals by reason of their
membership in a racial group and to incite racial hostility;"8 and
WHEREAS,
"...race is an impermissible arbiter of human fortunes...;"9 and
WHEREAS,
"Racial and ethnic distinctions of any sort are inherently suspect...;"10 and
WHEREAS,
"Racial classifications of any sort pose the risk of lasting harm to our
society
;"11 and
WHEREAS,
"[T]he individual is important, not his race, his creed, or his color";12 and
WHEREAS,
Racial classifications ". . . reinforce the belief, held by too many for too much of
our history, that individuals should be judged by the color of their skin;"13 and
WHEREAS,
"Race-based assignments embody stereotypes that treat individuals as the product of
their race, evaluating their thoughts and efforts-their very worth as citizens-according
to a criterion barred to the Government by history and the Constitution;"14 and
WHEREAS,
"A racial classification, regardless of purported motivation, is presumptively
invalid and can be upheld only upon extraordinary justification;"15 and
WHEREAS,
"[R]acial classifications. . .must serve a compelling governmental interest, and must
be narrowly tailored to further that interest";16
and
WHEREAS,
"[R]acial classifications are simply too pernicious to permit any but the most
exacting connection between justification and classification";17 and
WHEREAS,
"It would be a sad day indeed, were America to become a quota-ridden society, with
each identifiable minority group assigned proportional representation in every desirable
walk of life",18
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR FREDERICK COUNTY,
MARYLAND
§1. Identification of
Authorities that Purportedly Require Racial Classifications. - Each Division and
Department within the jurisdiction of the BOCC shall, not later than January 15, 2004,
provide the County Manager with specific citations to any federal or state statute,
regulation, rule, policy, grant condition, or other authority that purports to require the
Division or Department to categorize, classify, distinguish or identify citizens on the
basis of race.
§2. Cease and Desist. -
Beginning May 17, 2004 each Division and Department within the jurisdiction of the BOCC
shall cease, desist and refrain from the practice of categorizing, classifying,
distinguishing, or identifying citizens on the basis of race, unless the BOCC expressly
determines that the practice is required by a federal or state statute, regulation, rule,
policy, grant condition, or other authority that is narrowly tailored to serve a
compelling governmental interest.
§3. Delivery of Resolution to
Directors of County Divisions and Departments. - The County Manager and the County
Attorney are authorized and directed to send a copy of this Resolution to the Directors of
all Divisions and Departments within the jurisdiction of the BOCC.
§4. Short Title. - This
Resolution may be cited as the "Frederick County Racial Equality Act."
The undersigned hereby certify that the Board of County Commissioners of Frederick County,
Maryland approved and adopted the foregoing Resolution on the ___ day of ___, 2003.
| ATTEST: |
BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, MARYLAND By: |
_________________
Douglas D. Browning,
County Manager |
_________________________
John L. Thompson, Jr., President |
|
_________________________
Michael L. Cady, Vice President |
|
_________________________
John R. Lovell, Jr. |
|
_________________________
Jan H. Gardner |
|
_________________________
Bruce L. Reeder |
Download the Racial Equality Act
as an Adobe PDF file.
4.
News Stories about the "Racial Equality Act"
Below are excerpts
from article in the Frederick County Gazette (Gazette.Net) regarding racial classification
in Frederick County.
Thompson questions Walkersville
High minority policies 9/25/03
"Walkersville High School Principal Kristi Mitchell makes no apologies for trying to
give children of minority families a leg up in school. She says it's the mandate of the
state, after all.
"Vehemently opposed to that position, Frederick County Commissioner John L.
"Lennie" Thompson Jr. (R) of Walkersville is worried about what's going on at
Walkersville High. He says the school appears to be giving only minorities the benefit of
special programs, classifying students by race and assuming minority races need special
treatment.
| "The source of
Thompson's ire is a multicultural club at the school, which Mitchell says has been around
for about 10 years.
"Thompson said he first heard about the club recently, when some students told him
about a mysterious morning announcement made at the school. The announcement called for
"Asian, African American, Pacific Islander and Hispanic females" to attend a
meeting in the auditorium. A few days later, the same announcement was made to males of
those ethnic groups, Thompson said. |
Frederick
County Story Index:
|
|
"Thompson has long opposed race-based governmental actions. ... He objects to special
classes for minorities, such as special Scholastic Achievement Test preparation classes,
because they focus on race, he said.
"After hearing concerns about the announcements, [Ms.] Cosley [faculty advisor for
the Multicultural Club] and [Walkersville High School Principal] Mitchell acknowledged
that some might be concerned that the club excludes white students. But both repeatedly
emphasized that all students are welcome in the club.
"Cosley said the club is intended to teach children about diversity. ... And yes,
Scholastic Achievement Test preparation classes, with a special focus on helping minority
children, are available at Walkersville High, Mitchell said, but students of any ethnic
background are welcome to attend, she said.
"[Frederick County Commissioner] Thompson doesn't buy it. "This is racism
in its most flagrant example," Thompson said. "Schoolchildren...were told to go
to a particular place in the school on the basis of race."
"As a parent, Thompson said he is discouraged that a school would single out students
by race. ... From his perspective, disadvantaged children should get help, but no one
should be presumed disadvantaged just because of his or her race. "You don't
divvy up things on the basis of race," he said. "If you do it on the basis of
race, then race equals a disadvantage."
Excerpted
from the 9/25/03 Gazette story written by Chris Patterson, Staff Member
Last known link (opens new window):
http://www.gazette.net/200339/walkersville/news/179904-1.html
Little Support for Racial Equality
Act 11/6/03
"A proposed bill that would force Frederick County government departments and
divisions to stop classifying residents by race may struggle to find support among county
commissioners.
| "If passed,
the Racial Equality Act, being introduced by Commission President John "Lennie"
Thompson Jr. (R), could mean the county would lose out on state and federal grant money.
"While that's a risk Thompson is willing to take, at least two of the other four
commissioners are not thrilled at the thought of losing much-needed funds to other
counties. |
Commentary:
It is inaccurate to
state that the "Act" might result in loss of funding. Thompson's
resolution includes ample exemptions for federal programs and other funding sources which
require collection of racial data. --Editor |
|
"But [Frederick County Commissioner] Thompson is willing to forego state and federal
money if necessary.
| "I'm willing to assume the risk," he said. "This is an
unlawful condition that serves no governmental purpose whatsoever. Nobody has the guts to
do anything about it so it's still going on. People are afraid to do anything."
"Thompson's efforts for racial equality sparked in September 2002, when he attempted
to eliminate what he considers racial profiling by the Department of Aging.
"He unsuccessfully tried to remove a question from the department's registration form
asking for an applicant's race. |
Frederick
County Story Index:
|
|
"More recently, Thompson spoke out against officials at Walkersville High School who
called for "Asian, African American, Pacific Islander and Hispanic" students to
attend at meeting in the auditorium. The students were called out of class and asked to
join the school's multicultural club.
"Thompson's Racial Equality Act is designed to coincide with the 50th anniversary of
Brown vs. Board of Education. On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court unanimously declared that
separate educational facilities are inherently unequal and violate the 14th Amendment to
the U.S. Constitution."
Excerpted
from the 11/6/03 Gazette story written by Sherry Greenfield, Staff Writer
Last known link (opens new window):
http://www.gazette.net/200345/frederickcty/county/186593-1.html
5. Footnotes to the "Racial Equality Act"
Below are the
supporting footnotes to Frederick County's "Racial Equality Act". |
Top


Contact
Info |
| 1 |
Martin Luther King, Jr., August 28, 1963. |
Return to text |
| 2 |
Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81, 100 (1943); Oyama v.
California, 332 U.S. 633, 646 (1948); Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475, 478 n. 4 (1954);
University of California Regents v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 290-291 (1978); Adarand
Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200, 223-224 (1995); Rice v. Cayetano, Governor of
Hawaii, 528 U.S. 495, 517 (2000). |
Return to text |
| 3 |
Palmore v. Sidote, 466 U.S. 429, 432 (1984); Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S.
900, 912 (1995). |
Return to text |
| 4 |
Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S. 900, 911 (1995). |
Return to text |
| 5 |
Maryland Troopers Association v. Evans, 993 F.2d 1072, 1076 (4th Cir.
1993); Podberskey v. Kirwan, 38 F.3rd 147, 152 (4th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S.
1128 (1995). |
Return to text |
| 6 |
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630, 643 (1993). |
Return to text |
| 7 |
Rice v. Cayetano, Governor of Hawaii, 528 U.S. 495, 517 (2000). |
Return to text |
| 8 |
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630, 643 (1993); United States v. Hays, 515 U.S.
737, 744 (1995). |
Return to text |
| 9 |
Maryland Troopers Association v. Evans, 993 F.2d 1072, 1076 (4th Cir.
1993); Podberskey v. Kirwan, 38 F.3rd 147, 152 (4th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S.
1128 (1995); Eisenberg v. Montgomery County Public Schools, 197 F.3rd 123, 128 (1999),
cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1019 (2000). |
Return to text |
| 10 |
University of California Regents v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 291 (1978);
Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, 476 U.S. 267, 273 (1986); Adarand Constructors, Inc.
v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200, 218 (1995); Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S. 900, 904 (1995). |
Return to text |
| 11 |
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630, 657 (1993). |
Return to text |
| 12 |
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630, 648 (1993). |
Return to text |
| 13 |
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630, 657 (1993). |
Return to text |
| 14 |
Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S. 900, 912 (1995). |
Return to text |
| 15 |
Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256, 279
(1979); Crawford v. Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles, 458 U.S. 527, 536-537
(1982); Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1, 458 U.S. 457, 485 (1982); Shaw v.
Reno, 509 U.S. 630, 643-644 (1993). |
Return to text |
| 16 |
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200, 235 (1995). |
Return to text |
| 17 |
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200, 229 (1995); Gratz v.
Bollinger, ___ U.S. ___, (2003). |
Return to text |
| 18 |
Grutter v. Bollinger, ___ U.S. ___, (2003). |
Return to text |
6. Contact Info
Frederick
County Board of County Commissioners |
Top


Site
Index |
Winchester
Hall
12 E. Church Street
Frederick, MD 21701
301-694-1100 or
TDD 301-694-1672
Fax 301-694-1849
Commissioners'
E-Mail Addresses:
Download the Racial Equality Act
as an Adobe PDF file.
END Race Counting in Frederick County, Maryland |