Data
Coverage and Definitions
(From page 4 of the OPM
report.)
According to the Office of Personnel Management, the
following definitions are applicable:
"The Civilian Labor Force (CLF) data are derived from the Bureau of
Labor Statistics September 2000 Current Population Survey (CPS) and the 1990 Decennial
Census. The CPS is a sample of 50,000 households across the nation and the sample
changes from year-to-year. Because of the changing sample, there can be wide
fluctuations in a group, like Hispanics, depending on which households are selected.
Due to small sampling size, the CPS does not have separate counts for Asian/Pacific
Islanders or Native Americans. Each group's percentage representation in the CPS
was extrapolated using the 1990 census to calculate their proportional representation from
the CPS "Black and Other" category. The CLF data cover every
non-institutionalized individual 16 years of age and older, employed and unemployed U.S.
citizens and non-citizens, while the CPDF data are predominantly Federally-employed U.S.
citizens."
"The Relevant Civilian Labor Force (RCLF) is the Civilian Labor
Force (CLF) data that are directly comparable (or relevant) to the population being
considered in the FW (Federal Workforce). For example, if we were analyzing
representation of black engineers employed in the Federal workforce, we would compare them
with black engineers reported in the CLF. The black engineers in the CLF represent
the RCLF in this example. In the FEORP report, FW comparisons to the RCLF are the
basis for occupational analysis."
"Underrepresentation, as defined in 5 CFR, Section 720.202, means a
situation in which the number of women or members of a minority group within a category of
civil service employment constitutes a lower percentage of the total number of employees
within the employment category than the percentage that women or the minority group
constitutes within the civilian labor force of the United States."
Commentary:
OPM pointedly does not define overrepresentation for a given
minority group, and there is apparently no upper limit on the numbers of minorities that
can be given racially preferential treatment by government employers. Notice also
that OPM's definition of underrepresentation specifically
excludes white males and other non-minorities. Thus, under OPM's definitions, one
can logically infer that it is not possible for white males to be underrepresented -- or
even be discriminated against -- in federal employment. -- Editor |