Controversial,
black former UMass administrator
foists anti-white, race-based policies on the University of Massachusetts!
Fund to aid minority students
in the sciences (AP 12/02/99 - dead link)
AMHERST - "Randolph Bromery, the former chancellor of the University of
Massachusetts, has set up a fund for minority students in geosciences at the university.
''The fund represents a larger philosophy of increasing the numbers of African-Americans
in the scientific professions across the board,'' said Bromery.
The Associated Press story mentions that Randolph Bromery was also state chancellor of
higher education and president of Springfield College, and that he was interim president
of Westfield State College. The Associated Press story pointedly does NOT discuss
the circumstances surrounding Bromery's departure from those two institutions. (See Analysis, below.)
The fund will be controlled by Bromery and his wife, and the actual minority-only
(non-white) funds are being donated by NYNEX. The total amount of the fund may
exceed $250,000. (Gee, Adversity.Net thought the IRS rules were quite clear that
non-profit, tax-exempt organizations and foundations could NOT be racially
exclusive! Guess we were wrong! Do you suppose that means means that the IRS
has issued a special exemption for anti-white, pro-minority scholarship funds in the case
of the Bromery scholarships? Adversity.Net would be MOST interested to see the
specific IRS ruling in this case.) (Based on Associated Press 12/02/99 as it
appeared in the Boston Globe)
[former link
**http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/336/metro/Fund_to_aid_minority_students_in_the_sciences+.shtml]
Commentary
and Analysis:
Who IS Pro-Minority Randolph Bromery, and where does he come from?
The following are the observations of Brad Wilson, Executive Director of the National
Association of Scholars, Princeton, New Jersey. Mr. Wilson's comments are in
response to the AP story about the Bromery "minority scholarships".
Brad Wilson writes: "On the face of
it, [Bromery's] race-based scholarship looks to be unconstitutional. But that's not
the only remarkable thing about it. Randolph Bromery, the benefactor, is mentioned in the
[Associated Press] article as a former president of Springfield College. What is not
mentioned are his efforts to turn Springfield College into a re-education camp and the
circumstances of his departure from Springfield. Here is what I wrote on this matter
in a past NAS newsletter:
"...Or take the administration of President Randolph Bromery at Springfield College
in Massachusetts, worthy of dishonorable mention in the next edition of The Shadow
University. Mr. Bromery, a geophysicist by training and a former chancellor of the
University of Massachusetts, decided to make "diversity" the main concern of
university life. Committees were appointed to advance a diversity agenda. The
Institutional Priorities Committee dutifully issued a report on the president's behalf
announcing that the emphasis for Springfield College should be on individuals of various
racial/ethnic categories, individuals with disabilities, and individuals from other
countries. It is also important to note that the diversity of faculty is of critical
importance under this priority and that the Committee also seeks a more diverse staff
population.
"A few years after the campus had been thrown into turmoil by the administration's
politically correct action to change the name of the college's sports teams from the
Chiefs to the Pride, the Racial Diversity Committee brought in a Native American activist
to stir things up again, resulting in the student takeover of an administration building.
The committee also satisfied its social conscience by issuing imperious decrees like this
one:
|
"On Wednesday, October 30, at 10:15 a.m., every member of the Springfield College
campus community will stop and listen, will listen and learn, and will learn and speak
about racism here (especially here) and elsewhere. This opportunity to join together for
social justice represents the essence of the philosophy and mission of our College." |
"Mandatory faculty development programs, formerly devoted to nonpolitical pedagogical
issues, were enlisted as weapons in the war for social transformation. For example, the
spring 1997 Faculty Institute had racial diversity as its theme. There, members of the
faculty were compelled to participate in sessions like the following:
| I. |
Teaching
Racism by Ommission [sic]. This session looks at how racism is taught by what we omit in
the curriculum, through readings, assignments, references, and classsroom [sic]
discussion. |
| II. |
Recognizing
Racism in the Classroom. In this session methods of recognizing various overt and covert
forms of racism are offered including how issues of race are embedded in everyday
language. |
| III. |
What does
racism have to do with what and how I teach? Regardless of the demographic make-up of a
class or the particular content of a class, race is often a significant dynamic in the
classroom. This session offers an opportunity to discuss the pervasiveness of race in the
college context. |
| IV. |
Issues of
race in teaching Science, Math and Computer Technology. How issues of race are revealed
through factors such as teaching methods, student selection and retention and curriculum
design. |
(Brad Wilson, Executive Director
of the National Association of Scholars, Princeton, New Jersey: continues:)
"One faculty member who attended (he dared not skip it) sent a letter to his
colleagues describing the experience and what it had meant for him: "I and other more
senior colleagues were made to walk in a circle asking and answering pre-set questions and
confessing to alleged 'secret racist predispositions' to perfect strangers. The entire
exercise was infantile and humiliating."
"And then there was the mandatory workshop for those in teacher education, sponsored
by the Massachusetts Department of Education, on "Integrating Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual
Youth Issues into Teacher Preparation Programs."
"The shadow university at Springfield College did not go unchallenged. A group of
faculty joined with the director of campus ministry, Kenneth Childs, to produce a
publication by and for Springfield faculty. With its motto "Hey! It's Just Our
Opinion!" the journal published articles by Rev. Childs and others that often took
issue with decisions of the college president and his administration. On July 22, 1998, a
day of infamy at Springfield College, President Bromery fired Rev. Childs from the
position he had held for twenty-six years, informing him in writing that his criticism of
the president and his administration was "fostering dissention [sic] among College
constituencies." When Rev. Childs returned with his wife to the campus ministry
center on July 28 to pack up his belongings, he found that the lock on his office door had
been changed, and was forced to withdraw materials witnessing to his lifetime of service
to his college under the supervision of campus police. Later that evening, Reverend
Childs, fifty-six years of age and, before July 22 at least, in perfect health, died of a
massive heart attack.
(Wilson continues in his analysis of Bromerly):
| As Mr. Kors and Mr. Silverglate
write: "There are nations in the world where a college president indeed would
risk his life by standing up for academic freedom. That is not the situation in the United
States today. What is required is not so much courage as dedication to liberty and legal
equality supported by just a bit of backbone. The fact that our academic leaders are not
up to this task is alarming. The fear of disruption, of causing offense, of being
associated with controversy, linked to careerism, has produced a hollow, unprincipled
cowardice." |
(Wilson continues): "In
addition, one should not underestimate the arrogance that arbitrary power can breed,
particularly when it is wielded in the name of social justice.
"Soon after Rev. Child's death, the Board of Trustees of Springfield College released
a memorandum to the college announcing President Bromery's abrupt retirement. Further
corrupting the integrity of the college they govern, the trustees (in an all too common
public ritual) praised Mr. Bromery for his "distinguished service to the
College" and for his "highly successful career," making no mention of the
reasons for his departure, no mention that a grievous wrong had been done by Mr. Bromery
to a colleague with twenty more years than he of "distinguished service to the
College." Ecrasez l' infame!]
END of Massachusetts - Race-Based, Anti-White
Scholarships |