Page 1 of 5 - "Uniform Guidelines"

The Uniform Guidelines Enforce Reverse Discrimination

Parts 60-3 through 60-3.3
Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978)

 
Previous: Introduction to Guidelines < PREV: Introduction
Down:
DOWN:  60-3.1 "Purpose"
Purpose
NEXT: Parts 60-3.4 thru 3.12 > Next: 60-3.4 thru 3.12

Table of
Contents/Authority for Part 60-3
Down:
DOWN: 60-3.1 Statement of Purpose
60-3.1
Purpose
General Principles

60-3.1 Statement of purpose
A. Need for uniformity_Issuing agencies
B. Purpose of guidelines
C. Relation to prior guidelines

60-3.2 Scope
A. Application of guidelines
B. Employment decisions
C. Selection procedures
D. Limitations
E. Indian preference not affected

60-3.3 Discrimination defined: Relationship between use of selection procedures and discrimination
A. Procedure having adverse impact constitutes discrimination unless justified
B. Consideration of suitable alternative selection procedures

60-3.4 Information on impact
A. Records concerning impact
B. Applicable race, sex, and ethnic groups for recordkeeping
C. Evaluation of selection rates_The ''bottom line''
D. Adverse impact and the ''four-fifths rule''
E. Consideration of user's equal employment opportunity posture

60-3.5 General standards for validity studies
A. Acceptable types of validity studies
B. Criterion-related, content, and construct validity
C. Guidelines are consistent with professional standards
D. Need for documentation of validity
E. Accuracy and standardization
F. Caution against selection on basis of knowledges, skills, or abilities learned in brief orientation period
G. Method of use of selection procedures
H. Cutoff scores
I. Use of selection procedures for higher level jobs
J. Interim use of selection procedures
K. Review of validity studies for currency

60-3.6 Use of selection procedures which have not been validated
A. Use of alternate selection procedures to eliminate adverse impact
B. Where validity studies cannot or need not be performed
(1) Where informal or unscored procedures are used
(2) Where formal and scored procedures are used

60-3.7 Use of other validity studies
A. Validity studies not conducted by the user
B. Use of criterion-related validity evidence from other sources
(1) Validity evidence
(2) Job similarity
(3) Fairness evidence
C. Validity evidence from multiunit study
D. Other significant variables

60-3.8 Cooperative studies
A. Encouragement of cooperative studies
B. Standards for use of cooperative studies

60-3.9 No assumption of validity
A. Unacceptable substitutes for evidence of validity
B. Encouragement of professional supervision

60-3.10 Employment agencies and employment services
A. Where selection procedures are devised by agency
B. Where selection procedures are devised elsewhere

60-3.11 Disparate treatment

60-3.12 Retesting of applicants

60-3.13 Affirmative action
A. Affirmative action obligations
B. Encouragement of voluntary affirmative action programs

Technical Standards

60-3.14 Technical standards for validity studies
A. Validity studies should be based on review of information about the job
B. Technical standards for criterion-related validity studies
(1) Technical feasibility
(2) Analysis of the job
(3) Criterion measures
(4) Representativeness of the sample
(5) Statistical relationships
(6) Operational use of selection procedures
(7) Over-statement of validity findings
(8) Fairness
(a) Unfairness defined
(b) Investigation of fairness
(c) General considerations in fairness investigations
(d) When unfairness is shown
(e) Technical feasibility of fairness studies
(f) Continued use of selection procedures when fairness studies not feasible
C. Technical standards for content validity studies
(1) Appropriateness of content validity studies
(2) Job analysis for content validity
(3) Development of selection procedures
(4) Standards for demonstrating content validity
(5) Reliability
(6) Prior training or experience
(7) Training success
(8) Operational use
(9) Ranking based on content validity studies

D. Technical standards for construct validity studies
(1) Appropriateness of construct validity studies
(2) Job analysis for construct validity studies
(3) Relationship to the job
(4) Use of construct validity study without new criterion-related evidence
(a) Standards for use
(b) Determination of common work behaviors

Documentation of Impact and Validity Evidence

60-3.15 Documentation of impact and validity evidence
A. Required information
(1) Simplified recordkeeping for users with less than 100 employees
(2) Information on impact
(a) Collection of information on impact
(b) When adverse impact has been eliminated in the total selection process
(c) When data insufficient to determine impact

(3) Documentation of validity evidence
(a) Type of evidence
(b) Form of report
(c) Completeness
B. Criterion-related validity studies
(1) User(s), location(s), and date(s) of study
(2) Problem and setting
(3) Job analysis or review of job information
(4) Job titles and codes
(5) Criterion measures
(6) Sample description
(7) Description of selection procedure
(8) Techniques and results
(9) Alternative procedures investigated
(10) Uses and applications
(11) Source data
(12) Contact person
(13) Accuracy and completeness
C. Content validity studies
(1) User(s), location(s), and date(s) of study
(2) Problem and setting
(3) Job analysis_Content of the job
(4) Selection procedure and its content
(5) Relationship between selection procedure and the job
(6) Alternative procedures investigated
(7) Uses and applications
(8) Contact person
(9) Accuracy and completeness
D. Construct validity studies
(1) User(s), location(s), and date(s) of study
(2) Problem and setting
(3) Construct definition
(4) Job analysis
(5) Job titles and codes
(6) Selection procedure
(7) Relationship to job performance
(8) Alternative procedures investigated
(9) Uses and applications
(10) Accuracy and completeness
(11) Source data
(12) Contact person
E. Evidence of validity from other studies
(1) Evidence from criterion-related validity studies
(a) Job information
(b) Relevance of criteria
(c) Other variables
(d) Use of the selection procedure
(e) Bibliography
(2) Evidence from content validity studies
(3) Evidence from construct validity studies
F. Evidence of validity from cooperative studies
G. Selection for higher level jobs
H. Interim use of selection procedures

Definitions

60-3.16 Definitions
Appendix to Part 60-3

60-3.17 Policy statement on affirmative action (see section 13B)

60-3.18 Citations

Authority: Secs. 201, 202, 203, 203(a), 205, 206(a), 301, 303(b), and 403(b) of E.O. 11246; as amended by sec. 715 of Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000(e)-14).

Source: 43 FR 38295, 38314, August 25, 1978.
General Principles


60-3.1 - Statement of purpose.

  • Standard Number: 60-3.1
  • Standard Title: Statement of purpose.
DOL Cite: DOJ Cite: EEOC Cite:
41 CFR 60-3.1 28 CFR 50.14 (1) 29 CFR 1607.1

A. Need for uniformity - Issuing agencies. The Federal government's need for a uniform set of principles on the question of the use of tests and other selection procedures has long been recognized. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Civil Service Commission, the Department of Labor, and the Department of Justice jointly have adopted these uniform guidelines to meet that need, and to apply the same principles to the Federal Government as are applied to other employers.

B. Purpose of guidelines. These guidelines incorporate a single set of principles which are designed to assist employers, labor organizations, employment agencies, and licensing and certification boards to comply with requirements of Federal law prohibiting employment practices which discriminate on grounds of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. They are designed to provide a framework for determining the proper use of tests and other selection procedures. These guidelines do not require a user to conduct validity studies of selection procedures where no adverse impact results. However, all users are encouraged to use selection procedures which are valid, especially users operating under merit principles.

C. Relation to prior guidelines. These guidelines are based upon and supersede previously issued guidelines on employee selection procedures. These guidelines have been built upon court decisions, the previously issued guidelines of the agencies, and the practical experience of the agencies, as well as the standards of the psychological profession. These guidelines are intended to be consistent with existing law.


60-3.2 - Scope.

  • Standard Number: 60-3.2
  • Standard Title: Scope.
DOL Cite: DOJ Cite: EEOC Cite:
41 CFR 60-3.2 28 CFR 50.14 (2) 29 CFR 1607.2

A. Application of guidelines. These guidelines will be applied by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in the enforcement of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972 (hereinafter ''Title VII''); by the Department of Labor, and the contract compliance agencies until the transfer of authority contemplated by the President's Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1978, in the administration and enforcement of Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375 (hereinafter ''Executive Order 11246''); by the Civil Service Commission and other Federal agencies subject to section 717 of Title VII; by the Civil Service Commission in exercising its responsibilities toward State and local governments under section 208(b)(1) of the Intergovernmental-Personnel Act; by the Department of Justice in exercising its responsibilities under Federal law; by the Office of Revenue Sharing of the Department of the Treasury under the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972, as amended; and by any other Federal agency which adopts them.

B. Employment decisions. These guidelines apply to tests and other selection procedures which are used as a basis for any employment decision. Employment decisions include but are not limited to hiring, promotion, demotion, membership (for example, in a labor organization), referral, retention, and licensing and certification, to the extent that licensing and certification may be covered by Federal equal employment opportunity law. Other selection decisions, such as selection for training or transfer, may also be considered employment decisions if they lead to any of the decisions listed above.

C. Selection procedures. These guidelines apply only to selection procedures which are used as a basis for making employment decisions. For example, the use of recruiting procedures designed to attract members of a particular race, sex, or ethnic group, which were previously denied employment opportunities or which are currently underutilized, may be necessary to bring an employer into compliance with Federal law, and is frequently an essential element of any effective affirmative action program; but recruitment practices are not considered by these guidelines to be selection procedures. Similarly, these guidelines do not pertain to the question of the lawfulness of a seniority system within the meaning of section 703(h), Executive Order 11246 or other provisions of Federal law or regulation, except to the extent that such systems utilize selection procedures to determine qualifications or abilities to perform the job. Nothing in these guidelines is intended or should be interpreted as discouraging the use of a selection procedure for the purpose of determining qualifications or for the purpose of selection on the basis of relative qualifications, if the selection procedure had been validated in accord with these guidelines for each such purpose for which it is to be used.

D. Limitations. These guidelines apply only to persons subject to Title VII, Executive Order 11246, or other equal employment opportunity requirements of Federal law. These guidelines do not apply to responsibilities under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, not to discriminate on the basis of age, or under sections 501, 503, and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, not to discriminate on the basis of handicap.

E. Indian preference not affected. These guidelines do not restrict any obligation imposed or right granted by Federal law to users to extend a preference in employment to Indians living on or near an Indian reservation in connection with employment opportunities on or near an Indian reservation.


60-3.3 - Discrimination defined: Relationship between use of selection procedures and discrimination.

  • Standard Number: 60-3.3
  • Standard Title: Discrimination defined: Relationship between use of selection procedures and discrimination.
DOL Cite: DOJ Cite: EEOC Cite:
41 CFR 60-3.3 28 CFR 50.14 (3) 29 CFR 1607.3

A. Procedure having adverse impact constitutes discrimination unless justified. The use of any selection procedure which has an adverse impact on the hiring, promotion, or other employment or membership opportunities of members of any race, sex, or ethnic group will be considered to be discriminatory and inconsistent with these guidelines, unless the procedure has been validated in accordance with these guidelines, or the provisions of section 6 of this part are satisfied.

B. Consideration of suitable alternative selection procedures. Where two or more selection procedures are available which serve the user's legitimate interest in efficient and trustworthy workmanship, and which are substantially equally valid for a given purpose, the user should use the procedure which has been demonstrated to have the lesser adverse impact. Accordingly, whenever a validity study is called for by these guidelines, the user should include, as a part of the validity study, an investigation of suitable alternative selection procedures and suitable alternative methods of using the selection procedure which have as little adverse impact as possible, to determine the appropriateness of using or validating them in accord with these guidelines. If a user has made a reasonable effort to become aware of such alternative procedures and validity has been demonstrated in accord with these guidelines, the use of the test or other selection procedure may continue until such time as it should reasonably be reviewed for currency. Whenever the user is shown an alternative selection procedure with evidence of less adverse impact and substantial evidence of validity for the same job in similar circumstances, the user should investigate it to determine the appropriateness of using or validating it in accord with these guidelines. This subsection is not intended to preclude the combination of procedures into a significantly more valid procedure, if the use of such a combination has been shown to be in compliance with the guidelines.

NEXT:  60-3.4 - Information on Impact


Previous: Introduction to Guidelines < PREV: Introduction
NEXT: Parts 60-3.4 thru 3.12 > Next: 60-3.4 thru 3.12

 

Main Site Index:

Top:
Go to Top of Page
MAIN NEWS
Index

by category
DONATE
Contributions are tax-deductible
HORROR
STORIES

and case studies
TERMS
and Definitions
SEARCH
Site
LEGAL HELP
Firms and Resources
LINKS MESSAGE
Board
GO:  Home Page
Home
Page Index
URL's and page names for site
Favorite
EDITORIALS

National opinion
DIRTY RACIAL
POLITICS

How Quotas are Enforced
EDITOR'S DESK
What's Hot!
RACIAL
PROFILING

D.O.J. Requires It!
EDUCATIONAL
TESTING

News Analysis
CENSUS 2000
Racism
ABOUT US

Copyright 2002 Adversity.Net, Inc., an IRS 501(c)(3) tax-exempt educational organization.  For problems or questions regarding this web contact editor@adversity.net    Last updated: January 05, 2004.

Go to Adversity.Net Home Page

*  We use the term reverse discrimination reluctantly and only because it is so widely understood.  In our opinion there really is only one kind of discrimination.