Introduction and Overview
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights
New Commission is Suspicious of Racial Discrimination Policies which Favor Some Groups but Not Others In 2005 and 2006 the United States Commission on Civil Rights has held several hearings regarding racial preferences (race-sensitive policies, or "quotas"). They have found that such "race sensitive" policies not only do not work, but frequently also work against the intended beneficiaries. Below is a short list of recent Commission hearings and the available Commission reports:
In Disparity Studies as Evidence of Discrimination the Commission's expert panelists were extremely critical of the statistical validity -- or invalidity -- of disparity studies as a means of "proving" that racial quotas or preferences are necessary in government contracting efforts. (Official Commission Report Available) In Federal Procurement After Adarand the Commission strongly condemned government contracting agencies for failing to fully consider race neutral means of assuring equal treatment of all government contractors without resorting to the last resort method of imposing racial preferences or quotas. (Official Commission Report Available) In Affirmative Action in Law Schools the Commission heard compelling testimony from UCLA Law Professor Richard Sander in which he presented damning evidence that racial quotas in law school admissions actually hurt the chances of black law school students. (Official report not yet published. See Hearing Transcript and also News Clippings)
MISSION:
|
| <== Choose another topic in the left index | Visit the OFFICIAL web site of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission at: usccr.gov (Opens new browser window) |
| Top |
LOAD - RELOAD: |